[Gnso-newgtld-wg] REMINDER: Review Revised Draft Final Report - DUE Tuesday, 01 December

Tue Dec 1 23:26:17 UTC 2020

Here is the output of my review for consideration

*Community Applications*

[1] At page 160, Implementation Guideline 34.3 re: Criterion 1-A
Delineation.
Although the text draws attention to the need for a non-exhaustive list to
include elements applicable to communities that are not economic in nature,
it does not explicit touch on 5 other points that I believe the WG
discussed, which are:

   - Communities that are not economic in nature may not have clear and
   straight-forward membership definition and this should to not disadvantage
   such communities in terms of scoring as compared to economic communities
   with clear and straight-forward membership, that both types of communities
   should be able to score equally well
   - The extremity between "clear and straight-forward membership"
   scoring high and "vague, dispersed or unbound definition" scoring zero be
   mediated through an acknowledgment that a grouping without a clear and
   straight-forward membership but could still be found to be reasonably
   delineated may still receive a low score instead of zero.
   - I also recall that the term "membership" in reference to non-economic
   communities was problematic
   - Where could we explicitly introduce community-related expertise to the
   CPE process, especially to assist in evaluating non-economic communities
   for the delineation criterion where "community-related expertise" could be
   represented by an International Organization specializing in a certain
   field or a relevant subject matter / community expert of regional or
   international standing?
   - Redress for the requirement of "awareness and recognition of the
   community by its members" where such awareness and/or recognition could be
   alternatively provided by community-related expertise, especially in cases
   where awareness or recognition by the so-called members cannot be properly
   measured (eg, prevented by national law to recognise something)

[2] At page 160, Implementation Guidance 34.4 re: the "Organized" element
in Criterion 1-A Delineation
While the redress for term "mainly" as being permissibly applied to more
than one entity appears, redress for the term "administer" does not. I
recall having discussed adding the "advocate" verb because an applicant may
not fit the role of administrator for a community. I suggest that the
reference to "administer" be augmented to "administer or advocate for".
Perhaps an alternative might be "represent" instead of "administer" as used
in Implementation Guidance 34.8.

[3] The proposal to increase community participation or input in ICANN's
engagement of CPE service provider/panellists is pending further
discussion.

[4] Reference to lowering of the threshold to prevail in CPE, which if I
recall correctly was offered by more than one commenter, is omitted.

Thanks,
Justine

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 23:14, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:

> And here are the original attachments for reference.
>
>
>
> *From: *Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Monday, November 30, 2020 at 10:12 AM
> *To: *"gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-newgtld-wg] REMINDER: Review Revised Draft Final Report
> - DUE Tuesday, 01 December
>
>
>
> Dear WG Members,
>
>
>
> This is a reminder that the deadline for the review of the revised draft
> Final Report *for errors and omissions only*, if any, is *23:59 UTC on
> Tuesday, 01 December*.  Please see the details below.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> *From: *Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Monday, November 23, 2020 at 3:04 PM
> *To: *"gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Review Revised Draft Final Report - DUE
> Tuesday, 01 December
>
>
>
> Dear WG Members,
>
>
>
> As noted during the WG meeting on Thursday, 19 November, please see for
> review the attached revised draft Final Report in Word and PDF, along with
> the Log of Final Report Action Items and Edits.
>
>
>
> The redlines in the attached revised draft Final Report reflect the edits
> made by leadership and support staff in accordance with the *actions
> agreed to by the WG during the WG meetings* held between 17 September and
> 09 November 2020, as noted in the Log with page references.  These actions
> also were captured during each meeting and circulated to the WG.
>
>
>
> The following topics were covered by the WG in its meetings and addressed
> in the revised draft Final Report: Community Applications, General
> Comments, Predictability, Applicant Support, Limited Challenge/Appeal
> Mechanism, Applicant Guidebook, Communications, Systems, Application Change
> Requests, Application Fees, Base Registry Agreement, GAC Early Warning /
> GAC Consensus Advice, Role of Application Comment, and Objections.
>
>
>
> *Note: In reviewing the revised draft Final Report WG members are
> requested to limit their review to the referenced pages in the Log and the
> redlines in the revised draft Final Report, and to focus only on errors
> and/or omissions, if any.  If any errors/omissions are noted please send
> them to the WG email distribution list, referencing the page number and
> text, respectively.*
>
>
>
> Please submit comments to the list, if any, not later than *23:59 UTC on
> Tuesday, 01 December*.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20201202/e2582eec/attachment-0001.html>