[Gnso-newgtld-wg] ICANN's Use of Auction Proceeds - Proposed Final Report - CCWG Auction Proceeds - Public Comment due February 14

[Aikman-Scalese, Anne]

No suggestion whatsoever to open up the purposes of Auction proceeds within this group.  In any event, public comment on that report is welcome and the report may inform some who argue the public purpose of ICANN’s role.  In my personal opinion, Applicant Support certainly fits within those purposes, even if the grant requested amounts solely to a grant for purposes of developing a business plan, or preparing an application, etc.   The more public comment we get in CCWG Auction Proceeds, the better.

The issue of  operating the newgTLD program on a “cost recovery” basis is an argument for refunding any Auction Proceeds to applicants rather than continuing any sort of public purpose grant-making for proceeds of ICANN-supervised auctions.  (Contracted parties might prefer refunds rather than use of the funds for public benefit purposes such as Applicant Support, but please note there are also purposes listed in the Proposed Final Report that could easily benefit contracted parties as well – e.g. universal acceptance projects.)  This would all be up to the Independent Evaluation Panel, so long as grants stay within ICANN’s Mission.

Anne

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 9:44 AM
To: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] ICANN's Use of Auction Proceeds - Proposed Final Report - CCWG Auction Proceeds - Public Comment due February 14


(this whole e-mail sent not in my capacity as a member of the leadership team)

Does the WG feel a good and compelling reason to make the auction proceeds handling for subsequent procedures different from what is being decided for the 2012 round ? This is a very hard discussion within the community, and I don't see a good reason to decide differently.

There is a different matter which is the positive or negative result of the regular application fees versus program costs, which was a problem in 2012 that is in high need of a better solution, but for auction funds, I believe the years-long discussion shouldn't be reopened by this WG.



Rubens



Em 13 de jan de 2020, à(s) 13:38:000, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>> escreveu:

Dear new gTLD WG members,
To the extent that today’s policy discussion on resolution of string contention sets involved policy issues around what ICANN will do with Auction Proceeds from ICANN-supervised auctions, please see the attached Proposed Final Report of the CCWG- Auction Proceeds which emphasizes the Objectives and purposes for which such funds can be used.  Public comment is due February 14 so please do comment.

Because Auction Proceeds must be used within the scope of ICANN’s mission as a matter of corporate governance, I disagree with the comment that proceeds from the next round can be using to buy knitting needles.

Anne


Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>

_____________________________

<image001.png>

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/>

<image002.jpg>

Because what matters

to you, matters to us.™








________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
<proposed-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-final-23dec19-en-1.pdf>_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200113/6a228b66/attachment-0001.html>