<p dir="ltr">Hi,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make sense to poll about next call time only those who could attend today in first place.<br>
I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Best.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Rafik </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <<a href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org">gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><div><div><div>Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members,</div></div></div><span><div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><div><br></div><div>Per the action item on today’s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC. Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time. Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone’s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call.</div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards,</div><div>Julie </div><div><div></div></div></div></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org">Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg</a><br></blockquote></div>