<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Em 18 de jun de 2018, à(s) 08:58:000, <a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu" class="">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a> Wilkinson <<a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu" class="">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>> escreveu:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta charset="UTF-8" class="">
<div class=""><p class="">Phil - The only hint we have to date is that, apparently for security reasons, a rate of about 1000 new TLDs per year would be manageable.</p><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></blockquote>There is no such assertion anywhere either in the 2012 round or the next. I'll refer you to the security and stability section of the report, where we document that 1000 per year would be an administrative capacity limit, and for that capacity, it was said that it would not cause operational issues. That's different from saying that's the system limit, and what you can see in the report is the definition to not impose a limit, but to follow prudence and monitoring during the delegation cycle. </div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="">1. Personally, I find that figure rather high notably because of the lead times required between an application and a final delegation in the Root. I have asked on the Calls for an indication from the ICANN staff as to how many new applications, per month, they can handle in terms of the economic and technical due diligence that I assume would be required. We have not yet had a response.<br class=""></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>There was no economical due diligence made in the previous or foreseen for the next round. </div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class=""><br class="">2. I have also proposed that in policy terms the issue should be disaggregated into more manageable batches of categories, since many of the relevant parameters will be distinct. The obvious categories would be Brands, Geographical Names, Geographical Indications and IDNs (by script). There could be other re-groupiings of applications such as undeserved regions and Communities.<br class="">Policy would of course determine priorities in time.<br class=""><br class=""></p></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="">These options have not yet been discussed by the Work Tracks concerned.</p></div></div></blockquote>I remember a WT discussing exactly this option and deciding not to follow it. Note that WT discussions go a long way back before you joined, so reading the wiki with the session transcripts would be interesting to avoid getting to impressions like this. </div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Rubens</div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="">Regards</p><p class="">Christopher</p><div class=""> <br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div id="ox-24944e44d4" style="word-wrap: break-word;" class="">El 17 de junio de 2018 a las 23:16 Rubens Kuhl <<a href="mailto:rubensk@nic.br" class="">rubensk@nic.br</a>> escribió:<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 17 Jun 2018, at 14:59, Phil Buckingham <<a href="mailto:phil@dotadvice.co.uk" class="">phil@dotadvice.co.uk</a>> wrote:</div><br class="ox-24944e44d4-Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="ox-24944e44d4-WordSection1" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #1f497d;" class="">Steve,</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #1f497d;" class=""> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #1f497d;" class="">Thanks for the agenda.</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #1f497d;" class="">Sorry I won’t be able to make the call. I am at Royal Ascot, watching the horse races with Her Majesty !<span class="ox-24944e44d4-Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #1f497d;" class=""> </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #1f497d;" class="">Would it be possible to send a link to the Executive Summary. Will this executive summary show the number of anticipated applications and the associated costings , as well as timelines.<span class="ox-24944e44d4-Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #1f497d;" class=""> </span></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div class="">I don't think it was ever envisioned for the PDP to have those results, since they are dependent on both policy and program implementation. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Rubens</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><p class=""><br class=""> </p><blockquote type="cite" class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" class="">Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org</a><br class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>