<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
Alex,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I would point out gust by taking the theory that <span style="font-size: 16px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; text-indent: -24px;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">ICANN
and the new gTLD process is bound to serve the public interest and by extension closed generics are bound to serve the public interest to its logical extension that would mean that ANY registration requirements or restrictions on a new gTLD must be in the
public interest. Is that the intent here? If not, it is the logical intent. </span></span></div>
<div><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.666666984558105px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; text-indent: -24px;"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.666666984558105px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; text-indent: -24px;">This also creates a new mission for ICANN that doesn't exist in the current
bylaws. </span></div>
<div>
<div style="text-indent: -24px;"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14.666666984558105px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;"><br>
</span></font></div>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best Regards,</div>
<b>
<div><b><br>
</b></div>
Marc H.Trachtenberg</b>
<div>
<div>Shareholder</div>
<div>Greenberg Traurig, LLP</div>
<div>77 West Wacker Drive</div>
<div>Chicago, IL 60601</div>
<div>Office (312) 456-1020</div>
<div>Mobile (773) 677-3305</div>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:00 AM, Alexander Schubert <alexander@schubert.berlin> wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Is ICANN and the new gTLD process bound to serve the public interest – and should by extension closed generics bound to serve the public interest?</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<HR>If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.<BR>
</body>
</html>