[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Following up today's discussion on transferring names

[Maria Farrell]

Yes, at the minimum, there's an information disclosure issue here, but I'd
also like to see if it's possible to start with the principle that normal
ICANN policies, e.g. transfer, should also apply to privacy/proxy users,
and see how that might practically be implemented.

m


On 15 April 2014 17:03, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:

>  Hi All,
> I think it is more than information. We've touched on a gap - that
> requires disclosure as a condition of transfer - and a possibility of
> alternatives that would not require that disclosure. We've even touched on
> possibilities that might enable such a transfer - between registrars and
> between affiliated p/p service providers - to take place within the
> existing system and possibly using existing keys.  This is an important gap
> to fill from a Registrant perspective -- and a great discussion that should
> be continued!
>
> Best,
> Kathy
>
>
>
>
> :
>
>  I agree the discussion and presentation today were highly relevant to
> relay.
>
>
>
> On B 3 itself, should we be specifying that one responsibility of
> accredited providers is to fully disclose to customers how use of their
> service may impact the customer’s ability to transfer to another
> registrar?   (Or, put another way, how efforts to transfer will affect
> provision of the service.)
>
>
>
> If the relay obligation is sufficiently robust, then this disclosure
> requirement might be less important, but it would be worthwhile to mark
> this point here, pending the relay discussion.
>
>
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Maria Farrell
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:35 AM
> *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Following up today's discussion on
> transferring names
>
>
>
> Dear Don / Steve / James and Mary,
>
> Thanks so much for the presentation on today's call. I learnt a lot about
> how the privacy & proxy services interact with the transfer policies, which
> was hugely helpful.
>
> Can we make sure we tie this information / discussion into the relevant
> work items? My suggestion is that we would come back to what we learnt
> today when we come to talk about 'relay', and also towards the end of our
> work in the wrap-up side of things to do a sanity check on how any possible
> recommendations might impact on the transfer policy.
>
> Does that make sense? Or perhaps it fits into other areas I haven't
> considered.
>
> Many thanks to James for the presentation.
>
> All the best, Maria
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing listGnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140415/d7e97830/attachment-0001.html>