[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Side Questions

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi Again,
Regarding the "Side Questions" that Mary Wong has posted several times 
for our review, is there anything controversial about the following 
answers? Underlined italics below. Quick note: RAE = Registrant at 
Expiration.
Best,
Kathy

*"Side Questions" on Renewals & Transfers:*

 1. Per the ERRP, 'registrars must notify the registered name holder of
    the expiration at least two times'. Should there be a requirement
    for the P/P provider to pass these notices on to the P/P
    customer?/*  ==> _Yes_*/
 2. Per the ERRP, 'if a registration is not renewed by the RAE or
    deleted by the registrar, within five days after the expiration of
    the registration, the registrar must transmit at least one
    additional expiration notice to the RAE that includes instructions
    for renewing the registration'. Should there be a requirement for
    the P/P provider to pass these notices on to the P/P
    customer?///*==> _Yes_*/
 3. Per the ERRP, 'beginning at the time of expiration and through
    the DNS resolution interruption period described in paragraphs 2.2.2
    and 2.2.3, the RAE must be permitted by the registrar to renew the
    expired registration'. What if the underlying customer wants to
    renew the registration? Idem for restoration during the Redemption
    Grace Period. /*==> _during the time a Registrant would be allowed
    to renew the _*/_/*domain name during a Redemption Grace Period, a
    proxy/privacy customer should also be allowed to renew the domain
    name during the Redemption Grace Period. */_
 4. In relation to the IRTP, should there be any restrictions concerning
    transfers of P/P registrations? (e.g. some of the terms and
    conditions required for the P/P services to be removed during the
    transfer process). Depending on the response to this question,
    all communications in the IRTP currently go via the transfer contact
    (Registered Name Holder / Admin Contact). Should there be any
    requirements for this information to also be communicated to the P/P
    customer? What happens if there is a disagreement relating to the
    transfer between the P/P provider and the P/P customer? /*==>
    *//*_Communication from the Registrar concerning transfers of P/P
    registrations should certainly be passed on to the P/P Customer. 
    This is not spam, but important information re: the domain name. (As
    discussed in the last meeting or two, all correspondence from the
    registrar to the affiliated p/p provider re: the domain name should
    be passed on to the P/P customer. _*//_Would there be any
    exceptions?_//_)_/

The _Expired Registration Recovery Policy_ (ERRP): 
http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies/errp

The _Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy_ (IRTP): 
http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/transfers (NOTE: Please 
also check the GNSO's Active Projects page for the status of ongoing 
work on IRTP-B, IRTP-C and IRTP-D: 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active)


:
> Dear WG members,
>
> The proposed agenda for the next meeting is as follows:
>
>  1. Roll Call/SOI Update
>  2. Continue discussion of template for Category B Question 3
>     (including "side questions" pertaining to renewals and transfers)
>  3. (if time permits) Begin deliberations on template for Category C
>     Question 1
>  4. Next Steps/Next Meeting
>
>
> Please note that the WG wiki page has been updated with the latest 
> draft templates as well as the "side questions" on renewals and 
> transfers (also included in the prior message, below). In addition, we 
> have added links to the ERRP and IRTP, and to the GNSO's working pages 
> on the latter: https://community.icann.org/x/kzvRAg
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
> * One World. One Internet. *
>
> From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>
> Date: Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 10:32 PM
> To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> Subject: Updated Cat B Question 3 Template for further discussion and 
> review
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     Attached is a revised version of the draft template for Category B
>     Question 3, including a comment/question from our WG Chair. The
>     Chairs expect next week's discussion (22 April) to focus largely
>     on further discussions regarding this question and template,
>     including the additional questions relating specifically to
>     renewals and transfers as posted to the Notes pod in the Adobe
>     Connect room from the meeting earlier this week.
>
>     For your convenience, here are the questions:
>
>      1. Per the ERRP, 'registrars must notify the registered name
>         holder of the expiration at least two times'. Should there be
>         a requirement for the P/P provider to pass these notices on to
>         the P/P customer?
>      2. Per the ERRP, 'if a registration is not renewed by the RAE or
>         deleted by the registrar, within five days after the
>         expiration of the registration, the registrar must transmit at
>         least one additional expiration notice to the RAE that
>         includes instructions for renewing the registration'. Should
>         there be a requirement for the P/P provider to pass these
>         notices on to the P/P customer?
>      3. Per the ERRP, 'beginning at the time of expiration and through
>         the DNS resolution interruption period described in paragraphs
>         2.2.2 and 2.2.3, the RAE must be permitted by the registrar to
>         renew the expired registration'. What if the underlying
>         customer wants to renew the registration? Idem for restoration
>         during the Redemption Grace Period.
>      4. In relation to the IRTP, should there be any restrictions
>         concerning transfers of P/P registrations? (e.g. some of the
>         terms and conditions required for the P/P services to be
>         removed during the transfer process). Depending on the
>         response to this question, all communications in the IRTP
>         currently go via the transfer contact (Registered Name Holder
>         / Admin Contact). Should there be any requirements for this
>         information to also be communicated to the P/P customer? What
>         happens if there is a disagreement relating to the transfer
>         between the P/P provider and the P/P customer?
>
>     If it will help facilitate WG deliberations on Tuesday, please
>     feel free to send initial thoughts and responses to this mailing
>     list prior to the next call.
>
>     Thanks and cheers
>     Mary
>
>
>     Mary Wong
>     Senior Policy Director
>     Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>     Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
>     Email: mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
>
>     * One World. One Internet. *
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140421/b092cf39/attachment.html>