[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] The threshold question before Category C, Question 1

Tim Ruiz tim at godaddy.com
Tue Apr 29 15:03:54 UTC 2014

Agree with further discussion of the threshold here. I do not appreciate that the Chair just decides to call some of our concerns "rhetoric" and then decide on his own to move on. Steve, normally I consider you a very reasonable and fair WG member, here and in the past. But that was uncalled for and clearly panders to your own personal view, not that of the WG as a whole. As a result, this must be discussed further next week.


From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:04 AM
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] The threshold question before Category C, Question 1

Hi All,
Here's the threshold question we agreed to discuss *before* entering into the specific issues of the area:

Threshold Question:

Currently, proxy/privacy services are available to companies, noncommercial organizations and individuals.  Should there be any change to this aspect of the current system in the new accreditation standards?1

1 Several WG members noted that some questions in this Section are somewhat conditional, in that a Yes/No answer to one may obviate the need to answer others. The "use" of a domain for specific purposes may also implicate content questions. The WG agreed that these issues should be flagged for discussion when considering the WG's response to this Section.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140429/c2528213/attachment.html>

More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list