[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI Work Plan

Fri Jan 31 15:37:43 UTC 2014

Dear Don,

Here are my suggested questions. 

1) How will disputes about accreditation of a P/P service provider be
resolved?  

2) What will be the process for complaints that a particular accredited
provider no longer satisfies accreditation standards?

3)  Would there be an appeal mechanism if a provider is denied
accreditation?   

Best Personal Regards

Hector

Héctor Ariel Manoff

Vitale, Manoff & Feilbogen

Viamonte 1145 10º Piso

C1053ABW Buenos Aires

República Argentina

Te: (54-11) 4371-6100

Fax: (54-11) 4371-6365

E-mail:  <mailto:amanoff at vmf.com.ar> amanoff at vmf.com.ar

Web:  <http://www.vmf.com.ar> http://www.vmf.com.ar

De: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de Volker Greimann
Enviado el: jueves, 30 de enero de 2014 11:14
Para: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
Asunto: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI Work Plan

Hi Gema,

One note to Main issue 3 as it is proposed: This assumes that the provider
has that kind of access or ability. In many cases, the privacy service just
allows for the provision of its data and acts as a forwarding service. In
the case of the provider affiliated with us, the provider has one ability
only: Request the removal of its data from the whois. Other privacy services
may have even less influence over the registration-

So requiring a takedown or disabling/terminating the registrants' access may
not be something that a privacy or proxy service provider is set up to do,
depending on how he is integrated with the registrar/reseller/registrant.

In the past we have always talked about relay and reveal. These are the main
opptions every provider should have in my opinion. Anything beyond that may
not be feasible and may not even be in the remit of the provider. 

Volker

Am 30.01.2014 13:09, schrieb Campillos Gonzalez, Gema Maria:

Dear Group, 

I have worked on the PPSAI Charter Questions Grouping and here you have the
result. 

Best regards,

Gema Campillos

Deputy Director of Information Society Services 

Secretary of State for Telecommunications and Information Society

SPAIN

De: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de Mary Wong
Enviado el: miércoles, 29 de enero de 2014 16:57
Para: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
Asunto: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI Work Plan

Dear Don, Jim and everyone,

One of the various items for consideration in developing the WG's Work Plan
will involve the planned timing of deliverables relating to each category of
questions (however many there ultimately are or whether each category is
tackled by a different sub-team). The WG may wish to consider, for example,
whether certain questions/categories need to be addressed before others. 

Hopefully our next iteration of the Mind Map and proposed timeline/work plan
will assist the WG in discussing Jim's suggestions, which reflects the
methodology used in a couple of other WGs (and it is good to know that your
team felt the IGO-INGO WG experience was productive and helpful, Jim!). The
work plan is likely change over time depending on the nature and outcome of
the WG (or sub-team) discussions, and as Jim notes certain categories (e.g.
Main Issues) may be more organic than others.

Should the WG decide to proceed via sub-teams, another thing to consider
would be ensuring that the work is spread evenly across the WG rather than
have a small group of people spread across various sub-teams (especially if
the deliverables from those are due in short order!).

I hope these thoughts are useful. To assist with your review of Jim's
suggestions, I attach an updated version of Jim's document which adds the
threshold question for Section III discussed on the call yesterday (using
Steve's suggested wording) and with a couple of comments inserted to help
provide context to one or two sub-questions that Kathy had asked about.

Thanks and cheers

Mary

Mary Wong

Senior Policy Director

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

Telephone: +1 603 574 4892

Email: mary.wong at icann.org

* One World. One Internet. *

From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal at pir.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 9:45 AM
To: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff at sgbdc.com>, "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org"
<gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI Work Plan

Jim,

Thanks very much for all the work you put in on this. I am very anxious to
see the group’s thoughts on it. I will reserve mine for now except to note
that reviewing seven reports each week is inducing cold sweats already. :)

I will note up front though that apart from process considerations, staff
support availability will have to be part of our work plan decisions.

Best,

Don

From: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff at sgbdc.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 at 6:04 PM
To: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal at pir.org>, PPSAI
<gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: PPSAI Work Plan

Dear Don, 

As you indicated, a Work Plan should help guide our Group's efforts over the
upcoming weeks. We have some suggestions, based on our positive experience
in the IGO/INGO PDP Working Group. 

Please give us the benefit of your thoughts on the following suggested Work
Plan: 

1.      Summarize and compile Working Group survey responses --possibly in
an Excel file, circulated among Group members.  This should be a task for
ICANN Staff.    

2.      Based on Working Group survey responses, clarify the terminology and
issues in each Group of the Charter questions. Identify consensus or
near-consensus responses and hold Consensus Call on these issues. 

 3.     Create Working Group  sub-teams to work on issues by group: (a)
Registration; (b) Maintenance; (c) Contact; (d) Relay; (e) Reveal; (f)
Publication; (g) Termination.  Note that the current groupings of questions
do not include “Publication” or “Termination” categories.  We propose adding
these categories, which would include questions taken out of other current
categories, as identified in the attached redline draft.  Note also that the
remaining questions in the Main Issues group, an overarching category, would
be addressed organically as a result of this proposed process.   

      a) Each sub-team produces a report, which is delivered to Don by each
Friday or Saturday at the latest, so it can be combined by staff with the
other sub-team reports and discussed at the upcoming Tuesday Working Group
teleconference. 

      b) When the responses to the survey come in from the other
constituencies, ICANN staff summarizes the responses for the Working Group.
Each sub-team then analyzes the constituencies' and Working Group's
responses (including majority and minority views) in its area, and delivers
the result to Don by Friday or Saturday, so ICANN staff can combine it all
in one document, such as an Excel file, for full Working Group review. 

 4. Working Group holds Consensus Call and revises final Excel file of
responses to survey accordingly.  

5.    Draft report presenting (1) Consensus Proposals (if any); (2)
Non-Consensus Proposals w/ Levels of Support; (3) Minority Views w/Levels of
Support. 

 6.  Present Report for Public Comment.  

This process will provide a means to circle back to the remaining Main
Issues questions. 

Regards, 

Jim 

James L. Bikoff 

Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP 

1101 30th Street, NW 

Suite 120 

Washington, DC 20007 

Tel: 202-944-3303 

Fax: 202-944-3306 

jbikoff at sgbdc.com 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu 

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu 

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it
is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify
the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.

---
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140131/31b26250/attachment-0001.html>