[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Updated E-1 template

[Metalitz, Steven]

Thanks to staff for preparing the summary under "WG Response/Discussion" on the Question E. 1 template.  May I offer a couple of suggested tweaks to it?
First, I think in the discussion last week there was a good deal of support for the proposition that a policy not to forward any messages received (i.e., no relay at all) should not satisfy accreditation standards.  Could that be reflected in the summary?
Second, with regard to the statement regarding "safeguards against spurious, harassing or irrelevant complaints," are we saying that a policy to forward (relay) all submissions received (e.g., as stated in the terms of the Whois Privacy Service affiliated with above.com on the template, or the policy for Whoisproxy.com [Key Systems]) would not satisfy accreditation standards?  I don't think the summary meant to state that conclusion but we should be clearer on this point.
Steve Metalitz

From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 7:02 PM
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Updated E-1 template

Dear all,

The attached updated template for E-1 is an attempt to capture the flavor of the WG discussion that took place this week. Hopefully it will be helpful to you in further thinking through the question and the group in coming to preliminary conclusions over the next week or so. Please feel free to continue discussions on any of the points and on the question via email on this list prior to the next WG call on Tuesday.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140721/c52efe2d/attachment-0001.html>