[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Updated E-1 template

[David Hughes]

Steve,

On tomorrow's call I would like to discuss the requirement of p/p providers to forward hard copy letters.
It seems to me a p/p provider receiving a hard copy letter (after electronic communications has failed) needs to decide to either protect their client's privacy and forward the hard copy letter (possibly passing the cost on to the client) or decide to reveal that information to the sender of the hard copy and let them send the hard copy.   I don't know if there is an easy answer but not having a way to send hard copy correspondence when electronic communication has failed is problematic for us.

David Hughes

david hughes | svp technology | recording industry association of america
1025 f street NW, 10th fl| washington, dc  20004 | (direct) 202.857.9631 | (mobile) 917.733.4494


From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:50 PM
To: 'Mary Wong'; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Updated E-1 template

Thanks to staff for preparing the summary under "WG Response/Discussion" on the Question E. 1 template.  May I offer a couple of suggested tweaks to it?
First, I think in the discussion last week there was a good deal of support for the proposition that a policy not to forward any messages received (i.e., no relay at all) should not satisfy accreditation standards.  Could that be reflected in the summary?
Second, with regard to the statement regarding "safeguards against spurious, harassing or irrelevant complaints," are we saying that a policy to forward (relay) all submissions received (e.g., as stated in the terms of the Whois Privacy Service affiliated with above.com on the template, or the policy for Whoisproxy.com [Key Systems]) would not satisfy accreditation standards?  I don't think the summary meant to state that conclusion but we should be clearer on this point.
Steve Metalitz

From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 7:02 PM
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Updated E-1 template

Dear all,

The attached updated template for E-1 is an attempt to capture the flavor of the WG discussion that took place this week. Hopefully it will be helpful to you in further thinking through the question and the group in coming to preliminary conclusions over the next week or so. Please feel free to continue discussions on any of the points and on the question via email on this list prior to the next WG call on Tuesday.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140721/c1c8d73c/attachment-0001.html>