[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] For your review - updated template Cat D - Q4

[Kathy Kleiman]

There is something odd about the standardized reporting requirement. 
I'll send out some proposed edits later today...
Kathy:
>
> Don
>
> To avoid duplicative efforts wouldn't it be better to see how far APWG 
> et al had got with their standardized reporting stuff?
>
> M
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting & Colocation, Domains
>
> http://www.blacknight.co/
>
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
>
> http://www.technology.ie
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business 
> Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Don Blumenthal
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 18, 2014 12:20 PM
> *To:* Marika Konings; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] For your review - updated template 
> Cat D - Q4
>
> I shortened the description but didn't make substantive changes.
>
> The WG recommends that the requirements concerning forms of alleged 
> malicious conduct that would be covered by a providers's designated 
> published point of contact should include a list of forms of conduct 
> that would need to be covered. At the same time these requirements 
> should allow for the flexibility to accommodate new types of malicious 
> conduct. Section 3 of the Public Interest Commitments (PIC) 
> Specification in the New gTLD Registry Agreement[1] <#_ftn1> or 
> Safeguard 2, Annex 1 of the GAC's Beijing Communique[2] <#_ftn2> could 
> serve as examples for how this could be achieved.
>
> Furthermore, the WG recommends standardizing reporting forms, which 
> would nonetheless continue to include space for free form text. A 
> starting point for such a form could be that used under the Digital 
> Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States. At a minimum 
> such a form should include: [to be completed]. It was also suggested 
> that providers have the ability to "categorize" reports received, in 
> order to facilitate responsiveness.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [1] <#_ftnref1> Registry Operator will include a provision in its 
> Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in 
> their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name 
> Holders from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, 
> phishing, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or 
> deceptive practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity 
> contrary to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable 
> law and any related procedures) consequences for such activities 
> including suspension of the domain name.
>
> [2] <#_ftnref2> Registry Operator will include a provision in its 
> Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in 
> their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name 
> Holders from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, 
> phishing, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or 
> deceptive practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity 
> contrary to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable 
> law and any related procedures) consequences for such activities 
> including suspension of the domain name.
>
> ===================
>
> *From: *Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org 
> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
> *Date: *Wednesday, June 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM
> *To: *PPSAI <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] For your review - updated template Cat 
> D - Q4
>
> Dear All,
>
> Following yesterday's meeting, please find attached the updated 
> template for Cat D -- Q 4 attached for your review. Based on our 
> discussions, the proposed preliminary recommendation has been updated 
> as follows:
>
> ===============
>
> The WG recommends that the requirements in relation to which forms of 
> alleged malicious conduct would be covered by the designated published 
> point of contact at an ICANN-accredited privacy/proxy service provider 
> include an indicative list of forms of malicious conduct that would 
> need to be covered while at the same time these requirements should 
> allow for enough flexibility to accommodate new types of malicious 
> conduct being covered. Section 3 of the Public Interest Commitments 
> (PIC) Specification in the New gTLD Registry Agreementor Safeguard 2, 
> Annex 1 of the GAC's Beijing Communiquecould serve as examples for how 
> this could be achieved.
>
> Furthermore, the WG recommends standardizing reporting forms, which 
> would nonetheless continue to include space for free form text. A 
> starting point for such a form could be that used under the Digital 
> Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the United States. At a minimum 
> such a form should include: [to be completed]. It was also suggested 
> that providers have the ability to "categorize" reports received, in 
> order to facilitate responsiveness.
>
> Registry Operator will include a provision in its Registry-Registrar 
> Agreement that requires Registrars to include in their Registration 
> Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders from 
> distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy, 
> trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive 
> practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary 
> to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable law and 
> any related procedures) consequences for such activities including 
> suspension of the domain name.
>
> Registry Operator will include a provision in its Registry-Registrar 
> Agreement that requires Registrars to include in their Registration 
> Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders from 
> distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy, 
> trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive 
> practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary 
> to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable law and 
> any related procedures) consequences for such activities including 
> suspension of the domain name.
>
> ===================
>
> You are encouraged to share any comments / edits you may have with the 
> mailing list.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140619/35a8e4ca/attachment-0001.html>