[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list

Thu May 22 15:35:11 UTC 2014

Exactly our point.  I believe you also made this point a couple weeks ago. Despite the number of individual voices, there hasn't been a lot of diverse (from an SO/AC perspective) input. To that point, there should probably be outreach on this point. 

K

Kiran Malancharuvil 
Internet Policy Counselor
MarkMonitor
415-419-9138 (m) 

Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos. 

> On May 22, 2014, at 8:32 AM, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:
> 
> To Steve¹s point: What other SO/ACs are speaking on this? Aren¹t we all
> (or at least the vocal elements) GNSO?
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> On 5/22/14, 10:05 , "Kiran Malancharuvil"
> <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com> wrote:
> 
>> I believe we intended to make clear that, as working group members, we do
>> not vote as individuals but rather as representatives of our individual
>> SO/AC/C. While a vote hasn't taken place yet, it's important to remember
>> that sheer volume of vocal individuals isn't the point, regardless of
>> where you fall on the issue.
>> 
>> K
>> 
>> Kiran Malancharuvil
>> Internet Policy Counselor
>> MarkMonitor
>> 415-419-9138 (m)
>> 
>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
>> 
>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:01 AM, "Metalitz, Steven"
>> <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Libby, this is a helpful contribution.
>> 
>> Could you clarify one point:
>> 
>> ³However, a number of WG members, representing their SO/AC/C,
>> disagreedŠ.²  Which SO/AC/C are you referring to ?
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> From: Libby Baney [mailto:libby.baney at fwdstrategies.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 10:55 AM
>> To: Marika Konings
>> Cc: Metalitz, Steven;
>> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>> 
>> All -- as evidenced on last week's call, there is concern about the
>> language in the draft conclusion for Cat C threshold question. Per the
>> request for specific edits, attached are redlined edits to the template
>> submitted for the group's consideration by FWD Strategies Int'l,
>> LegitScript, MarkMonitor and DomainTools. We look forward to your
>> comments and further discussion if needed.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Libby
>> 
>> www.FWDstrategies.com<http://www.FWDstrategies.com>
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Marika Konings
>> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>> wrote:
>> Following on from Steve's emails, please find attached the updated
>> templates for C3 and D1, incorporating the notes from the meeting (if
>> I've missed anything, please share your comments / edits with the mailing
>> list). To re-emphasise the action items from the meeting:
>> 
>> 1.  Please provide your input on the draft preliminary conclusion for C
>> threshold, C1 and C2 as circulated by Don. Several of you suggested
>> removing the word 'overwhelming' from the draft. Are there any other
>> proposed edits?
>> 2.  Please provide your input on question C3, especially if you are of
>> the view that there should be differences in the data fields displayed
>> for commercial entity and natural person P/P registrations.
>> 3.  Please provide your input on question D1, especially whether it
>> would be desirable to have a public registry of P/P services contact
>> information and a requirement to respond to enquiries both from P/P
>> customers as well as those looking to contact P/P customers. Input on
>> what would qualify as a 'response' and a possible timeframe for responses
>> are also encouraged.
>> 4.  Kathy and James will provide an update at the next meeting on
>> issues surrounding transfers between registrars of P/P registrations and
>> possible questions the WG may want to address in this context.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
>> 
>> From: <Metalitz>, Steven <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>>
>> Date: Tuesday 20 May 2014 18:06
>> To: Marika Konings
>> <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>,
>> "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
>> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
>> Subject: PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>> 
>> Thanks to all participants on today¹s call.  Following up on requests
>> made on the call ----
>> 
>> Regarding Don¹s draft preliminary text regarding questions C(threshold),
>> C 1 and C2, please circulate your comments and (especially welcomed!)
>> proposed edits.  Don¹s draft is re-attached here for ready reference.
>> 
>> Regarding question C.3:  If the following applies to you, please respond
>> on the list:
>> 
>> IF you believe that privacy/proxy services ought to be open to commercial
>> entities under some circumstances, THEN should there be a difference in
>> the data displayed for such registrations (vs. what is displayed for p/p
>> registrations by natural persons)?  If the answer is YES, please specify
>> the differences.
>> 
>> For myself I will say that my answer is NO, but I hope that any YES
>> people will step forward on the list.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Steve Metalitz, vice chair
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: 
>> gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann
>> .org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika
>> Konings
>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:39 PM
>> To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - PPSAI WG Meeting
>> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's PPSAI WG Meeting.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
>> 
>> Proposed Agenda  PPSAI WG Meeting  20 May 2014
>> 
>> 1.  Roll Call / SOI
>> 2.  Review proposed preliminary conclusion for threshold question, C1
>> and C2 (as circulated by Don)
>> 3.  Review C3  is additional response/discussion needed in light of
>> item 2? (see template attached)
>> 4.  Continue deliberations on D1 (see updated template attached)
>> 5.  Next steps / confirm next meeting
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Libby Baney, JD
>> President
>> FWD Strategies International
>> www.fwdstrategies.com<http://www.fwdstrategies.com>
>> P: 202-499-2296
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
> 