[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
Volker Greimann
vgreimann at key-systems.net
Fri May 23 10:33:23 UTC 2014
Hi Holly,
I see a few issues with the ALAC osition, so I hope these can be cleared
up in discussion:
>
> /The ALAC strongly supports amending the Privacy Proxy Specification
> such that:/
>
/The //Privacy Proxy Specificationis an obligation that the registrar
has to uphold. We cannot be expected to police third party providers.
Yet amending the Spec to make it applicable to all providers would do
just that. If you mean that the terms of the spec should also be applied
in an accreditation program for providers, that would be another matter.
/
>
> * /It is applicable to all Privacy and Proxy providers./
> * /The personal details of the beneficial user are verified in
> accordance with verification requirements in the 2013 RAA. The
> process should ensure that, at least when the information is
> collected, that the proposed beneficial user is a real
> person/organisation and that the contact details are those of the
> proposed beneficial user./
>
/...this lacks the definition of who needs/ to do that verification.
>
> * /Limits on access to the personal information of the beneficial
> user must be clear and balance the legitimate privacy requirements
> of the beneficial user as against the legitimate needs of law
> enforcement agencies and UDRP providers./
>
/In other words, a clearly delineated reveal policy?
/
> We did not - and do not - have concerns about whether the P/P
> beneficial user is a commercial entity or a person that uses the
> service for some/all commercial purposes. Our concerns are about
> accreditation of the P/P (who does it, who checks, what penalties),
> the accuracy of the Whois data (when and how) and limits on access
> that respect privacy obligations - balanced against legitimate needs
> for access to that data. There is a lot in that sentence that needs
> to be worked through but that is the baseline.
Good to hear. Those concerns broadly seem similar to mine.
Best,
Volker
> On 23 May 2014, at 3:08 am, Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com
> <mailto:met at msk.com>> wrote:
>
>> Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>> Kiran, I agree with your second sentence. I don't agree with the
>> first because (a) in fact WG participants are not always representing
>> the constituency or other group with which they identify and (b) as
>> others have pointed out, there is only a very limited role for voting
>> in WGs.
>>
>> But getting back to the text that you and others proposed:
>>
>> Could the proponents of the text identify the SG AC or C which they
>> are representing in disagreeing with the position that use of p/p
>> registrations for commercial activities should not be prohibited in
>> accreditation standards?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent with Good (www.good.com <http://www.good.com>)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> *From: *Kiran Malancharuvil [Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com
>> <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com>]
>> *Sent: *Thursday, May 22, 2014 08:06 AM Pacific Standard Time
>> *To: *Metalitz, Steven
>> *Cc: *Libby Baney; Marika Konings; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>>
>> I believe we intended to make clear that, as working group members,
>> we do not vote as individuals but rather as representatives of our
>> individual SO/AC/C. While a vote hasn't taken place yet, it's
>> important to remember that sheer volume of vocal individuals isn't
>> the point, regardless of where you fall on the issue.
>>
>> K
>>
>> Kiran Malancharuvil
>> Internet Policy Counselor
>> MarkMonitor
>> 415-419-9138 (m)
>>
>> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
>>
>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:01 AM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met at msk.com
>> <mailto:met at msk.com><mailto:met at msk.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Libby, this is a helpful contribution.
>>
>> Could you clarify one point:
>>
>> "However, a number of WG members, representing their SO/AC/C,
>> disagreed...." Which SO/AC/C are you referring to ?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> From: Libby Baney [mailto:libby.baney at fwdstrategies.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 10:55 AM
>> To: Marika Konings
>> Cc: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>>
>> All -- as evidenced on last week's call, there is concern about the
>> language in the draft conclusion for Cat C threshold question. Per
>> the request for specific edits, attached are redlined edits to the
>> template submitted for the group's consideration by FWD Strategies
>> Int'l, LegitScript, MarkMonitor and DomainTools. We look forward to
>> your comments and further discussion if needed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Libby
>>
>> www.FWDstrategies.com
>> <http://www.FWDstrategies.com><http://www.FWDstrategies.com
>> <http://www.fwdstrategies.com/>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Marika Konings
>> <marika.konings at icann.org
>> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org><mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
>> wrote:
>> Following on from Steve's emails, please find attached the updated
>> templates for C3 and D1, incorporating the notes from the meeting (if
>> I've missed anything, please share your comments / edits with the
>> mailing list). To re-emphasise the action items from the meeting:
>>
>> 1. Please provide your input on the draft preliminary conclusion
>> for C threshold, C1 and C2 as circulated by Don. Several of you
>> suggested removing the word 'overwhelming' from the draft. Are there
>> any other proposed edits?
>> 2. Please provide your input on question C3, especially if you are
>> of the view that there should be differences in the data fields
>> displayed for commercial entity and natural person P/P registrations.
>> 3. Please provide your input on question D1, especially whether it
>> would be desirable to have a public registry of P/P services contact
>> information and a requirement to respond to enquiries both from P/P
>> customers as well as those looking to contact P/P customers. Input on
>> what would qualify as a 'response' and a possible timeframe for
>> responses are also encouraged.
>> 4. Kathy and James will provide an update at the next meeting on
>> issues surrounding transfers between registrars of P/P registrations
>> and possible questions the WG may want to address in this context.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> From: <Metalitz>, Steven <met at msk.com
>> <mailto:met at msk.com><mailto:met at msk.com>>
>> Date: Tuesday 20 May 2014 18:06
>> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org
>> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org><mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>,
>> "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
>> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
>> Subject: PPSAI WG -- questions for list
>>
>> Thanks to all participants on today's call. Following up on requests
>> made on the call ----
>>
>> Regarding Don's draft preliminary text regarding questions
>> C(threshold), C 1 and C2, please circulate your comments and
>> (especially welcomed!) proposed edits. Don's draft is re-attached
>> here for ready reference.
>>
>> Regarding question C.3: If the following applies to you, please
>> respond on the list:
>>
>> IF you believe that privacy/proxy services ought to be open to
>> commercial entities under some circumstances, THEN should there be a
>> difference in the data displayed for such registrations (vs. what is
>> displayed for p/p registrations by natural persons)? If the answer is
>> YES, please specify the differences.
>>
>> For myself I will say that my answer is NO, but I hope that any YES
>> people will step forward on the list.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Steve Metalitz, vice chair
>>
>>
>>
>> From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>
>> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:39 PM
>> To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - PPSAI WG Meeting
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's PPSAI WG Meeting.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> Proposed Agenda -- PPSAI WG Meeting -- 20 May 2014
>>
>> 1. Roll Call / SOI
>> 2. Review proposed preliminary conclusion for threshold question,
>> C1 and C2 (as circulated by Don)
>> 3. Review C3 -- is additional response/discussion needed in light
>> of item 2? (see template attached)
>> 4. Continue deliberations on D1 (see updated template attached)
>> 5. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Libby Baney, JD
>> President
>> FWD Strategies International
>> www.fwdstrategies.com
>> <http://www.fwdstrategies.com><http://www.fwdstrategies.com
>> <http://www.fwdstrategies.com/>>
>> P: 202-499-2296
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140523/2f273cd3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list