[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] A very brief report f from M3AAWG

Chris Pelling chris at netearthone.com
Fri Oct 24 16:29:37 UTC 2014

Hey Don,

The only purpose of that in all fairness is the harvesting of information and the requestors being able to then create their own internal DB of "number" = registrant, so for future requests if it is in the DB, rather than the due process, they can simply not deal with the PP provider.

I am sure some PP providers will end up randomizing and changing the "ID" over and over again.

Kind regards,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal at pir.org>
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
Sent: Friday, 24 October, 2014 4:30:54 PM
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] A very brief report f from M3AAWG

I gave a presentation at this week’s conference in Boston. It was a something of a 20 minute version of the ICANN All Things WHOIS program, although with fewer topics and a focus on details that were most likely to be of interest to the anti abuse community. 

Four people raised the same suggestion either before the session or during Q/A: Require providers to assign unique IDs to their customers so that we can identify the p/p registrations held by a given entity even if we don’t know who is it. 

We can explore the idea or not, but I am certain that it will be suggested in public comments to our draft report. FWIW, the suggesters (word?) aren’t affiliated and were an international group. 

Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org

More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list