[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go back in too
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at kathykleiman.com
Tue Apr 21 15:07:44 UTC 2015
Hi All,
As we work to close the document, I would like to point out another
change that was proposed, but not discussed or accepted. It's the
deletion of the words
"but not limited to" in the opening of III.C. This was proposed by Val,
not discussed on our call, and not accepted by the group. I would like
to ask that the initial words ("including but not limited to"), in the
draft for so long, be continued... as they are standard drafting
language --- and do not limit the broad sets of responses so many
supported today.
Best,
Kathy
III.C. Disclosure can be reasonably refused, for reasons consistent with
the general policy stated herein, including, but not limited to any of
the following: ***
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list