[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go back in too

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Tue Apr 21 15:33:42 UTC 2015

I would second this proposal.
On 15-04-21 11:07 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> Hi All,
> As we work to close the document, I would like to point out another 
> change that was proposed, but not discussed or accepted. It's the 
> deletion of the words
> "but not limited to" in the opening of III.C.  This was proposed by 
> Val, not discussed on our call, and not accepted by the group. I would 
> like to ask that the initial words ("including but not limited to"), 
> in the draft for so long, be continued... as they are standard 
> drafting language --- and do not limit the broad sets of responses so 
> many supported today.
> Best,
> Kathy
> III.C. Disclosure can be reasonably refused, for reasons consistent 
> with the general policy stated herein, including, but not limited to 
> any of the following: ***
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list