[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Issue-spotting for the WG's preliminary recommendations

Mon Aug 17 16:41:41 UTC 2015

Can we rephrase the responses to sound more neutral as to the result?

3. Response to Question 3: Does proposed requirement to label p/p 
registrations as such have an impact on the benefit or value of such 
registration and if what should be the result of this? (Comments 18, 25, 
31)

4.            Response to Question 8:  Should providers be required to 
forward all disclosure requests to customers, unless prohibited by law?  
(Comments 17, 29)  (I.e., should this feature of Annex E be made 
applicable to all disclosure requests, not just those relating to 
intellectual property?)

5. Response to Question 8:  Should the option of registration 
cancellation in lieu of disclosure be maintained or prohibited? 
(Comments 24, 31)
(Please also note that the cancellation of the registration may not even 
be a tool in the toolkit of the privacy provider, depending on his 
degree of integration with the registrar.)

The law enforcement authority as discussed for the RAA was supposed to 
only include official state-run law enforcement bodies and such agencies 
designated by law with certain powers comparable to official LEAs. We 
have seen a small number of cases where the language was later used 
beyond what was intended to organizations that received no more than a 
latter from a government agency supporting that organizations work.
Our definition therefore should limit the scope of LEAs to that 
originally intended definition, not the unintended definition the 
language currently allows.

Best,

Volker

Am 14.08.2015 um 23:50 schrieb Metalitz, Steven:
>
> Pursuant to Mary’s request, I suggest the following additional issues 
> raised in comments contained in the public comment tool document 
> summarized, for possible consideration by the WG:
>
> 3. Response to Question 3:   Should the proposed requirement to label 
> p/p registrations as such be dispensed with because it reduces the 
> benefit or value of such registration? (Comments 18, 25, 31)
>
> 4. Response to Question 8:  Should providers be required to forward 
> all disclosure requests to customers, unless prohibited by law?  
> (Comments 17, 29)  (I.e., should this feature of Annex E be made 
> applicable to all disclosure requests, not just those relating to 
> intellectual property?)
>
> 5. Response to Question 8:  Should the option of registration 
> cancellation in lieu of disclosure be prohibited?  (Comments 24, 31)
>
> In addition, with regard to issue #2 as summarized  below (“law 
> enforcement authority” definition):  since the definition in our 
> initial report was copied from the 2013 RAA, can any registrars in our 
> group report on whether or not this definition has thus far caused 
> difficulties in the RAA context (e.g., have there been problems in 
> determining whether a complaint from a “quasi-governmental entity” 
> should be handled under RAA section 3.18.2, with its 24-hour time 
> limit, rather than under 3.18.1)?
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
> *From:*gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Mary Wong
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:04 PM
> *To:* gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Issue-spotting for the WG's preliminary 
> recommendations
>
> Dear WG members,
>
> As noted on the WG call earlier today, please send to this your 
> suggestions for issues arising out of specific public comments 
> received on the WG’s Preliminary Recommendations #1 through #9 that 
> you think should be discussed by the broader WG.
>
> From the call today, two issues with Recommendation #1 were identified 
> for WG consideration:
>
>   * Whether the definitions include lawyers and law firms that provide
>     proxy registration services for their clients other than as a
>     primary business offering;
>   * The possible breadth/vagueness of the proposed definition of “law
>     enforcement authority” as including quasi-governmental and other
>     entities
>
> Since the WG Public Comment Review Tool for these nine recommendations 
> have been in circulation since 20 July, please treat this email as a 
> “last call” for issue-spotting concerning these nine recommendations – 
> as such, *please send any issues you spot to this list by Friday 14 
> August. Please also indicate in your email which 
> comment(s)/commenter(s) you are referring to as raising the issue(s) 
> you identify. *Note that, as confirmed during the WG call today, this 
> exercise is for purposes of issue-spotting only at the moment rather 
> than final resolution, which will depend on further discussions, as 
> appropriate.
>
> Staff will compile the issues so identified for review by the WG on 
> our next call.
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
>
> Senior Policy Director
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
>
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150817/2b53379a/attachment-0001.html>