[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] A proposed approach for reviewing public comments

[Mary Wong]

Dear WG members,

Following from the WG call earlier today, the co-chairs and staff after some
consultation would like to propose the following approach for your
consideration:

1. Use of Sub Teams for Specific Topics:
* Sub-teams comprising a few WG volunteers each can be formed to do the
initial review of public comments received on the three topics suggested by
Steve on the call, i.e. (1) Section 1.3.2 of the Initial Report (on
escalation of relay requests and the handling of disclosure/publication
requests from third parties other than IP rights holders); (2) Section 1.3.3
(on the open question regarding online financial transactions); and (3)
Annex E (the Illustrative Disclosure Framework).
* To assist the WG evaluate the usefulness of sub teams, a sub team for
Section 1.3.2 can be formed first and serve as a ³test case² for the
exercise.
* As outlined on the call, a sub team will do a ³first pass² through a
template, based on the Public Comment Review Tool, that staff will populate
with all the input received on that particular issue. The sub team will
report back to the full WG in a timely fashion, including suggesting a WG
response and/or proposed action in relation to the comments received.
* Sub teams may elect to do their work via email and online tools (e.g.
Google Docs or a wiki page), with or without supplemental conference calls.
Any calls will be recorded and transcribed for transparency purposes, and
drafts and other documents prepared using online tools will also be made
available to the full WG. (Do note, however, that depending on call
scheduling and timing, staff support may not be available for all requested
calls if several sub teams are used concurrently.)
PLEASE VOLUNTEER FOR SUB TEAM 1.3.2 IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ASSISTING WITH
THIS INITIAL REVIEW. Staff will endeavor to provide the template tool for
1.3.2 to the sub team as soon as possible, hopefully by Monday.

2. Full WG Review of Other Comments to Continue in Parallel:
* Staff will ³collapse² (per James¹ suggestion on the call) all those
template responses received that were simply a Yes or No answer to a
question, without any further comment added ­ these will be reflected in the
Public Comment Review Tool accordingly, as a single collective entry. The
current Tool (covering Preliminary Recommendations 1 through 9) will be
updated in time for the WG to begin this review on the next call.

3. Collated Information:
* In addition to the updated spreadsheet just circulated by Graeme, we can
also send you archived mail files of the contributions received to the
public comment forum, should you or your group wish to conduct searches
through each comment yourselves.

We hope the above will be helpful in facilitating good progress on the work
to be done in preparation for the Final Report.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
Email: mary.wong at icann.org






  




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150714/24730aa1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5044 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150714/24730aa1/smime.p7s>