[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] A proposed approach for reviewingpubliccomments

Thu Jul 16 12:14:21 UTC 2015

I'm happy to join Phil on #3

Holly 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Corwin" 
To:"Deacon Alex" , "Mary Wong" 
Cc:"gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org" 
Sent:Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:45:59 +0000
Subject:Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] A proposed approach for reviewing
public comments

 If this is the initial structure then put me on #3. Thanks.   
  Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

 Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
 Virtualaw LLC
 1155 F Street, NW. Suite 1050
 Washington, DC 20004
 202-559-8597/Direct
 202-559-8750/Fax
 202-255-6172/Cell
 Twitter: @VLawDC

 "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey 

		   FROM: Deacon, Alex  SENT: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:41 PM  TO:
Mary Wong  CC: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org  SUBJECT: Re:
[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] A proposed approach for reviewing public comments 

Hi Mary.   Please sign me up for sub team 1.3.2  
 Alex  
  On Jul 14, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Mary Wong  wrote: 
  Dear WG members, 
 Following from the WG call earlier today, the co-chairs and staff
after some consultation would like to propose the following approach
for your consideration: 
  1. Use of Sub Teams for Specific Topics: 

	* Sub-teams comprising a few WG volunteers each can be formed to do
the initial review of public comments received on the three topics
suggested by Steve on the call, i.e. (1) Section 1.3.2 of the Initial
Report (on escalation of relay requests and the handling of
disclosure/publication requests from third parties other than IP
rights holders); (2) Section 1.3.3 (on the open question regarding
online financial transactions); and (3) Annex E (the Illustrative
Disclosure Framework).
 	* To assist the WG evaluate the usefulness of sub teams, a sub team
for Section 1.3.2 can be formed first and serve as a “test case”
for the exercise.
 	* As outlined on the call, a sub team will do a “first pass”
through a template, based on the Public Comment Review Tool, that
staff will populate with all the input received on that particular
issue. The sub team will report back to the full WG in a timely
fashion, including suggesting a WG response and/or proposed action in
relation to the comments received.
 	* Sub teams may elect to do their work via email and online tools
(e.g. Google Docs or a wiki page), with or without supplemental
conference calls. Any calls will be recorded and transcribed for
transparency purposes, and drafts and other documents prepared using
online tools will also be made available to the full WG. (Do note,
however, that depending on call scheduling and timing, staff support
may not be available for all requested calls if several sub teams are
used concurrently.)

 PLEASE VOLUNTEER FOR SUB TEAM 1.3.2 IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
ASSISTING WITH THIS INITIAL REVIEW. Staff will endeavor to provide the
template tool for 1.3.2 to the sub team as soon as possible, hopefully
by Monday. 
  2. Full WG Review of Other Comments to Continue in Parallel: 

	* Staff will “collapse” (per James’ suggestion on the call) all
those template responses received that were simply a Yes or No answer
to a question, without any further comment added – these will be
reflected in the Public Comment Review Tool accordingly, as a single
collective entry. The current Tool (covering Preliminary
Recommendations 1 through 9) will be updated in time for the WG to
begin this review on the next call.

  3. Collated Information: 

	* In addition to the updated spreadsheet just circulated by Graeme,
we can also send you archived mail files of the contributions received
to the public comment forum, should you or your group wish to conduct
searches through each comment yourselves.

 We hope the above will be helpful in facilitating good progress on
the work to be done in preparation for the Final Report. 
 Thanks and cheers Mary 
   Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email:
mary.wong at icann.org [2] 

  _______________________________________________
 Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org [3]
 https://mm.icannorg/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg   

-------------------------

	No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com [4]
 Version: 2015.0.5961 / Virus Database: 4365/10125 - Release Date:
06/29/15
 Internal Virus Database is out of date.  

Links:
------
[1] mailto:mary.wong at icann.org
[2] mailto:mary.wong at icann.org
[3] mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
[4] http://www.avg.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150716/8579dee7/attachment.html>