[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for WG call on 31 March
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at kathykleiman.com
Mon Mar 30 17:34:50 UTC 2015
Tx Mary, much to discuss tomorrow. In the meantime, would it be
possible to get a full redline of the draft document from last week to
this week -- both the inserts and the deletions? I think there was a
lot of text deleted and it would be go to be able to review it easily....
Tx!
Kathy
On 3/30/2015 1:28 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
> Thanks, Kathy – just to clarify that it wasn’t clear to us (staff)
> that the list discussions resulted in agreement to change the type of
> signatory, from someone who has to describe the “nature of his/her
> authority to speak for the TM (or copyright) owner”, with two
> illustrative examples (i.e. the authorization can be to a licensed
> attorney or a corporate officer), to a more limited class consisting
> either of the rights-holder, legal counsel or a corporate officer. It
> seemed to us that questions still remained over issues such as parity
> and the need to have the request originate from someone who has
> performed a legal analysis of the alleged infringement. I apologize if
> that is not the case, and am happy to change the draft as suggested
> for the call tomorrow.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
>
> From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com
> <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>>
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 12:57
> To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>"
> <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for WG call on
> 31 March
>
> Hi Mary and All,
> I would like to point out that the discussion in Request Templates
> has moved a past the current draft language in II.C.6. -- and the
> current language still leaves room for someone to be a secretary,
> clerk or computer. The language being proposed last week is/was
> "*authorized legal representative" -- meaning counsel or attorney
> working for the company or as outside counsel. *It would of course
> be appropriate, for those businesses too small to have counsel to
> have the language (that is newly included), "*or corporate officer
> with signing authority if trademark is owned by a legal entity."
>
> **So the proposed language as we were discussing it last week
> should be:**
> *
>
>
> *c) ** Signed by the trademark owner (where an
> individual), the authorized legal representative and
> counsel of the trademark owner **(e.g. licensed attorney
> handling the alleged infringement), or corporate officer
> with signing authority (if trademark is owned by a legal
> entity).***
>
> Ditto for the copyrights. Now we have someone we can trust to
> submit the Reveal Request - and someone we can trust with the
> personal and sensitive data when it is Revealed - a proper
> authority for accountability!
> Best,
> Kathy
>
> On 3/30/2015 10:45 AM, Mary Wong wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The proposed agenda for our call on Tuesday 31 March is as follows:
>>
>> 1. Roll call/updates to SOI
>> 2. Discuss Annex to draft Disclosure framework document (see
>> attachment)
>> 3. Discuss Section III.C of draft Disclosure framework document
>> (see second attachment)
>> 4. Discuss remaining issues concerning draft Disclosure
>> framework and Category F (if time permits)
>> 5. Next steps/next meeting
>>
>> Please note that for ease of review, the Annex has been saved –
>> and is being circulated as – a separate document. In this
>> version, staff has attempted to rephrase (without changing the
>> meaning or substance) of some of the language that appeared as
>> shorter-form text in the original draft framework. We have also
>> inserted two comments/questions for consideration by the WG.
>>
>> Please note also that, in respect of the draft Disclosure
>> framework document, this version accepts most of the changes
>> discussed/proposed at the last few meeting, with the exception,
>> mainly, of the following:
>>
>> * _The details to be disclosed about the identity of the
>> Requestor, including who can be a Signatory_: this version
>> includes the recent changes from 16 & 22 March proposed by
>> Kathy, with the exception that an option to replace the
>> specific senior titles for a Signatory with the concept of an
>> authorized corporate officer is offered.
>> * _The grounds for refusal to disclose in III.C_: this version
>> incorporates suggestions from the last WG call and adds the
>> language suggested by Todd Williams to III.C.5.
>>
>> Thanks and cheers
>> Mary
>>
>> Mary Wong
>> Senior Policy Director
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
>> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20150330/6d7bb039/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list