<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    I do not believe in making all our customers pay more just to
    exclude a few bad apples that can also be weeded out by making an
    abuse report.<br>
    <br>
    Verification will also not help against crime, at least not as long
    as there are public data register like phone books or public whois
    as any criminal can simply duplicate verifyable data.<br>
    <br>
    Volker<br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:alpine.LRH.2.03.1401201126470.24895@sanctuary.coldrain.net"
      type="cite">
      <br>
      Hi James,
      <br>
=====================================================================
      <br>
      As Don has just said that this discussion is premature, I will
      stop answering these emails, unless something happens to change
      that. If you wish to continue the discussion with me, please
      contact me off list.
      <br>
      ==================================================================
      <br>
      <br>
      Please don't be silly. Criminal whatever. And of course they lie.
      <br>
      <br>
      If Registrars actually verified registrations, this would not be
      an issue.
      <br>
      <br>
      &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; --bob
      <br>
      <br>
      On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, James M. Bladel wrote:
      <br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">Criminal individuals, or criminal
        commercial organizations?
        <br>
        <br>
        And is it your contention that criminals provide valid
        <br>
        identification/contact details to the P/P service?
        <br>
        <br>
        Thanks&#8249;
        <br>
        <br>
        J.
        <br>
        <br>
        <br>
        On 1/20/14, 10:20 , "Bob Bruen" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bruen@coldrain.net">&lt;bruen@coldrain.net&gt;</a>
        wrote:
        <br>
        <br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <br>
          <br>
          Hi Tim,
          <br>
          <br>
          The harm is protecting the identities of criminnals. And I
          consider
          <br>
          undermining whois a harm, as well
          <br>
          <br>
          &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; --bob
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Tim Ruiz wrote:
          <br>
          <br>
          <blockquote type="cite">What are the problems commercial
            entities that use p/p have caused?
            <br>
            <br>
            <blockquote type="cite">On Jan 20, 2014, at 8:11 AM, "Bob
              Bruen" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bruen@coldrain.net">&lt;bruen@coldrain.net&gt;</a> wrote:
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              Hi Volker,
              <br>
              <br>
              I was merely responding to Stephanie's comments about the
              <br>
              difficulties, not advocating a position.
              <br>
              <br>
              However, as you are aware, I do advocate barring
              commercial entities
              <br>
              from using p/p, because the use has already caused harm
              and we should
              <br>
              fix that. The providers created the problem in the first
              place, so
              <br>
              allowing them to continue to control it simply continues
              the problem.
              <br>
              <br>
              The discussion of all this is the point of this group (and
              other
              <br>
              groups).
              <br>
              <br>
              &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; --bob
              <br>
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite">On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Volker
                Greimann wrote:
                <br>
                <br>
                I agree that it would be possible to bar commercial
                entities from
                <br>
                using p/p services, however I am not sure it is the
                <br>
                sensible thing to do. Certainly, there is abuse, but by
                creating a
                <br>
                blanket prohibition, i fear more damage will be done to
                <br>
                legitimate interests than good is done to illegitimate
                ones.
                <br>
                In the end it should be up to the provider which
                categories of
                <br>
                clients it accepts.
                <br>
                Volker
                <br>
                Am 20.01.2014 02:08, schrieb Bob Bruen:
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Hi Stephanie,
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It is entirely possible to decide to bar commercial
                entities,
                <br>
                create a definition of "comercial entities" and
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; then deal with those which appear to problematical.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The fraudsters probably will not be a set up as a
                legitimate
                <br>
                bussiness, but their sites can be identified as
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; spam, malware, etc types and thus taking money,
                therefore a
                <br>
                business. I am sure there are other methods to deal
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; with problem domain names.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In general, exceptions or problems should not
                derail a process.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; --bob
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I dont want to keep beating a dead horse
                here....but if
                <br>
                there is a resounding
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; response of "yes indeed, bar commercial
                entities from
                <br>
                using P/P services", then
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; how are you going to propose that p/p proxy
                service
                <br>
                providers determine who is a
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; commercial entity, particularly in
                jurisdictions which
                <br>
                have declined to regulate
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the provision of goods and services over the
                Internet?&nbsp; I
                <br>
                don't like asking
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; questions that walk us into corners we cannot
                get out of.
                <br>
                Do the fraudsters we
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; are worried about actually apply for business
                numbers and
                <br>
                articles of
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; incorporation in the jurisdictions in which
                they operate?
                <br>
                I operate in&nbsp; a
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; jurisdiction where this distinction is often
                extremely
                <br>
                difficult to make.&nbsp; THe
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; determination would depend on the precise use
                being made
                <br>
                of the domain
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; name....which gets ICANN squarely into
                content analysis,
                <br>
                and which can hardly be
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; done for new registrations, even if t were
                within ICANN's
                <br>
                remit.&nbsp; I am honestly
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; not trying to be difficult, but I just have
                not heard a
                <br>
                good answer to this
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; problem.
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Stephanie Perrin
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; On 2014-01-19, at 4:38 PM, Holly Raiche
                wrote:
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Jin and all
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I agree with Jim here (and Don earlier).&nbsp; The
                important
                <br>
                task here is
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; agreeing on the questions to be asked of the
                SO/ACs.&nbsp; So
                <br>
                we need to get
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; back to framing the questions - not answering
                them,
                <br>
                however tempting that
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; may be.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; So the question of whether 'commercial
                entities' should be
                <br>
                barred is still
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; a useful question to ask.&nbsp; The next question
                would be
                <br>
                whether there are
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; possible distinctions that should be drawn
                between an
                <br>
                entity that can use
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the service and one that can't and, if so,
                where is the
                <br>
                line drawn. I agree
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; with the discussion on how difficult that
                will be because
                <br>
                many entities
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; that have corporate status also have
                reasonable grounds
                <br>
                for wanting the
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; protection of such a service (human rights
                organisations
                <br>
                or women's refuges
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; come to mind).&nbsp;&nbsp; But that is the sort of
                response we are
                <br>
                seeking from
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; others outside of this group - so let's not
                prejudge
                <br>
                answers.&nbsp; Let's only
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; frame the questions that will help us come to
                some
                <br>
                sensible answers.
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Otherwise, we'll never get to the next
                steps.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; And my apologies for the next meeting.&nbsp; I
                have a long day
                <br>
                ahead on
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Wednesday (Sydney time) and taking calls at
                2.00am won't
                <br>
                help.&nbsp; So Ill read
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the transcript and be back in a fortnight (2
                weeks for
                <br>
                those who do not use
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the term)
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Holly
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; On 16/01/2014, at 5:39 AM, Jim Bikoff wrote:
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Don and all,
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; As we suggested earlier, and discussed in the
                last Group
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; teleconference, it might be helpful, as a
                next step, if we
                <br>
                reached a
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; consensus on the groups of questions before
                sending them
                <br>
                out to
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; SO/ACs and SG/Cs.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This would involve two steps: First, agreeing
                on the name
                <br>
                of each
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; group; and second, streamlining the questions
                in each
                <br>
                group.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In the first step, we could consider
                alternative headings
                <br>
                (perhaps
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; REGISTRATION instead of MAINTENANCE).
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; And in the second step, we could remove
                duplicative or
                <br>
                vague
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; questions.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This crystallization would make the questions
                more
                <br>
                approachable, and
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; encourage better responses.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I hope these ideas are helpful.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Best,
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Jim
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; James L. Bikoff
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Silverberg, Goldman &amp; Bikoff, LLP
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1101 30th Street, NW
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Suite 120
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Washington, DC 20007
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Tel: 202-944-3303
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fax: 202-944-3306
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jbikoff@sgbdc.com">jbikoff@sgbdc.com</a>
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; From: Don Blumenthal
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dblumenthal@pir.org">&lt;dblumenthal@pir.org&gt;</a>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Date: January 14, 2014 11:09:23 AM EST
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; To: PPSAI <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">&lt;gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org&gt;</a>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Carlton's
                closing chat
                <br>
                question
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Carlton posted an issue that shouldn&sup1;t
                wait a week:
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &sup3;John came up with 4 groups. Do we have a
                notion that
                <br>
                others
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; might be extracted?&nbsp; And where do we
                include/modify
                <br>
                questions
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; to address Stephanie's issue?"
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Jim had four groups and an umbrella Main
                category, which
                <br>
                may be
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; instructive in itself in guiding how we
                proceed
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; organizationally. Regardless, the consensus
                of commenters
                <br>
                has
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; been that his document is a significant
                improvement over
                <br>
                where
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; we were before, and I suggest that we use it
                as a baseline.
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; However, we still have work to do on it. Feel
                free to
                <br>
                suggest
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; modifications.
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Don
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
                _______________________________________________
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
                <br>
                <br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a>
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
                _______________________________________________
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a>
                <br>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
                _______________________________________________
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
                <br>
                &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________
                <br>
                Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
                <br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
                <br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              --
              <br>
              Dr. Robert Bruen
              <br>
              Cold Rain Labs
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://coldrain.net/bruen">http://coldrain.net/bruen</a>
              <br>
              +1.802.579.6288
              <br>
              _______________________________________________
              <br>
              Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________
              <br>
              Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          --
          <br>
          Dr. Robert Bruen
          <br>
          Cold Rain Labs
          <br>
          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://coldrain.net/bruen">http://coldrain.net/bruen</a>
          <br>
          +1.802.579.6288
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verf&uuml;gung.

Mit freundlichen Gr&uuml;&szlig;en,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:vgreimann@key-systems.net">vgreimann@key-systems.net</a>

Web: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.key-systems.net">www.key-systems.net</a> / <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.RRPproxy.net">www.RRPproxy.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.domaindiscount24.com">www.domaindiscount24.com</a> / <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.BrandShelter.com">www.BrandShelter.com</a>

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems">www.facebook.com/KeySystems</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.twitter.com/key_systems">www.twitter.com/key_systems</a>

Gesch&auml;ftsf&uuml;hrer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.keydrive.lu">www.keydrive.lu</a> 

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur f&uuml;r den angegebenen Empf&auml;nger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Ver&ouml;ffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empf&auml;nger ist unzul&auml;ssig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht f&uuml;r Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:vgreimann@key-systems.net">vgreimann@key-systems.net</a>

Web: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.key-systems.net">www.key-systems.net</a> / <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.RRPproxy.net">www.RRPproxy.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.domaindiscount24.com">www.domaindiscount24.com</a> / <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.BrandShelter.com">www.BrandShelter.com</a>

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems">www.facebook.com/KeySystems</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.twitter.com/key_systems">www.twitter.com/key_systems</a>

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.keydrive.lu">www.keydrive.lu</a> 

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.



</pre>
  </body>
</html>