<html><body>Hi Don<br /><br />I'm happy to go with this. I'm sure there will be lots more comments, but I think the task is to get something out and get people thinking.<br /><br />On a related matter, APRALO (as host RALO in Singapore) is holding a two hour multi stakeholder meeting (that's all of you) that was originally going to look at the metrics issue, but the September Board decision confined what that work will be, so we are now thinking that we should change the topic to a discussion on both the P/P and EWG topics - both being related. It will be an opportunity for hear from all stakeholders, with a few speakers from different parts of ICANN. So if this document has gone out for comment, the forum will be a good opportunity for everyone to talk through the input. And because the EWG raises many of the same issues, we can have an update on EWG progress.<br /><br />Happy for feedback on that<br /><br />Holly<br /><br /><br /><br /><blockquote><br />----- Original Message -----<br /><div style="width:100%;background:rgb(228,228,228);"><div style="font-weight:bold;">From:</div> "Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal@pir.org></div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">To:</div>"PPSAI" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</div>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:45:44 +0000<br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</div>[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document<br /><br /><br /><div>Good afternoon,</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>We have done some more tweaking over the last couple of days. We tried to incorporate all suggestions that we received or heard on calls. However, some specific points were left out because they struck us as redundant. Don’t hesitate to say “put it back
because it meant something else in a different group.”</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>The document still needs work: substance, organization, specific language, typos, and more. However, we are pushing it out now so that WG members have time to examine, comment, and edit. As I wrote before, the list will be a fluid document as we continue
our work.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>I’ll add a high level note. Our basic mission is to develop an accreditation system for p/p providers. Some might even argue that anything more is beyond our remit. Taking an expansive view, rules for use of p/p, or a determination that there should be
no restrictions, will be part of developing the accreditation system. On the other hand, that p/p will continue strikes me as having been established by ICANN.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>I look forward to continuing our work.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Don</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><br /></div>
</blockquote></body></html>