<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><div><div>Dear WG members,</div><div><br></div><div>As requested by Don and noted in his message below, attached is an edited version of the document that Don has sent, in both CLEAN and REDLINED versions. Please note that this version has not yet been reviewed by Don, Steve or Graeme – however, in the interest of expediency it is being sent around now to enable you to review it before the next WG call on Tuesday. As the redlined version is now rather crossed-over, multiple times, you may find it easier to read the clean version!</div><div><br></div><div>As Don has mentioned, this edited version does NOT have most of the substantive discussions/answers/notes that several WG members had sent via their redlines of the last Groupings document to the list. Rest assured, however, that all these comments and notes have been saved, and will be redistributed or raised again when the WG proceeds to tackle those particular questions. </div><div><br></div><div>In those places where WG members have suggested moving certain questions to different categories, I have done so where this is consistent with Don's latest suggested grouping. I have also taken the liberty of adding several footnotes that attempt to summarize certain suggestions and comments made previously.</div><div><br></div><div>Finally, I attach also the Issues Chart from the original Staff Paper that was published prior to the GNSO Council's initiation of this PDP, in the hope that as you review and discuss the latest grouping of charter questions it will be helpful background.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers, and have a great weekend, everyone,</div><div>Mary</div><div><span style="font-family: Calibri; "><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Calibri; ">Mary Wong</span></div><div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Senior Policy Director</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Telephone: +1 603 574 4892</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Email: mary.wong@icann.org</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri"><br></font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">* One World. One Internet. *</font></font></div></div></div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> Don Blumenthal <<a href="mailto:dblumenthal@pir.org">dblumenthal@pir.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Friday, January 31, 2014 2:59 PM<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> PPSAI <<a href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Questions<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>Thanks for all of your contributions that last few days. I took Michele’s last version and tweaked it add Hector’s comments. That should capture everything since Tuesday. I am attaching a 1/31 iteration.</div><div><br></div><div>However, our focus now needs to be the work plan, and locking the initial questions down is the first step. With that in mind, we will distribute a version of today’s file on them. You won’t see the substantive points in the next file that comes your
way, except where the points address why an item should or should not be in the list. We will work off this document next Tuesday.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Don</div></div></div></blockquote></span></body></html>