<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Stephanie Perrin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca" target="_blank">stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Particularly, I think that if products sold are tainted, then there is plenty of other consumer protection law that applies...why are we trying to solve that problem? </blockquote>
</div><br><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large">My question as well...although backed into...maybe from a different philosophical perspective.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large">
<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large">Just one clear distinction. My view makes no distinction between a registrar as P/P provider or a non-registrar providing a P/P service; so far as I care, its the service that must be regulated, and same rules apply, regardless of origin or primary business of the provider. The risk is directly connected to service provision.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large">-Carlton</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'comic sans ms',sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div><br>==============================<br>Carlton A Samuels<br>Mobile: <a href="tel:876-818-1799" value="+18768181799" target="_blank">876-818-1799</a><br>
<i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i><br>=============================</div>
</div></div>