<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); "><div>Please note that as a result of the Locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Procedures the UDRP rules will be modified and will include the provision below, amongst other changes (expected effective date 1 August 2015). I've underlined the section that may be of specific interest in relation to this conversation:</div><div><br></div><div><div><i>(b) Within two (2) business days of receiving the Provider’s verification request, the Registrar shall provide the information requested in the verification request and confirm that a Lock of the domain name has been applied. The Registrar shall not notify the Respondent </i><i>of the proceeding until the Lock status has been applied. The Lock shall remain in place through the remaining Pendency of the UDRP proceeding. <u>Any updates to the Respondent’s data, such as through the result of a request by a privacy or proxy provider to reveal the underlying customer data, must be made before the two (2) business day period concludes or before the Registrar verifies the information requested and confirms the Lock to the UDRP Provider, whichever occurs first.</u> Any modification(s) of the Respondent’s data following the two (2) business day period may be addressed by the Panel in its decision.</i></div><div><br></div><div>It is my recollection from the WG deliberations that in certain cases the P/P provider does want to update the Whois details in case of a UDRP filing in order not to be listed as the respondent in the complaint (but others can correct me if I got that wrong).</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Marika</div><div><br></div><div>________________________________________</div><div> [CT1] <#_msoanchor_1>Rec.</div><div>4 & 7</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> [CT2] <#_msoanchor_2>Rec. 12</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div><div>On 23/09/14 16:03, "Chris Pelling" <<a href="mailto:chris@netearth.net">chris@netearth.net</a>> wrote:</div><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div><br></div><div>Hi Kathy</div><div><br></div><div>Disclosure is only to the UDRP processor, it doesnt mean that WHOIS </div><div>details are updated.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Chris</div><div><br></div><div>NetEarth One, inc</div><div><br></div><div>On 23/09/2014 2:36 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:</div><div> > Hi All,</div><div> > In preparing for today's call, a few of us had a question: how do P/P</div><div> > Providers handle UDRP filings. Does that become a Disclosure,</div><div> > Publication, depends...? Quick answers welcome.</div><div> ></div><div> > Tx!</div><div> > Kathy</div><div> > _______________________________________________</div><div> > Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list</div><div> > <a href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a></div><div> > <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div>Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list</div><div><a href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a></div><div><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a></div><div><br></div></blockquote></body></html>