<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Kristina,<br>
<br>
In my experience with dealing with WIPO for example, thats not
true, we receive from them a request for information to confirm
registrant, we reply with the "registrant" information (and all
the other questions that are asked) and they then send to the
complainee the updated registrant information requesting an
amendment to the requested complaint/process docs.<br>
<br>
I am almost "100"% sure on that - let me check.<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Kind regards,
Chris</pre>
On 01/10/2014 2:59 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2CFA03BA9889274B88587EE2DF303C82072D3A5E71@CBIvEXMB05DC.cov.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
p.msochpdefault, li.msochpdefault, div.msochpdefault
{mso-style-name:msochpdefault;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.emailstyle17
{mso-style-name:emailstyle17;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">Under
the scenario Chris is suggesting, the UDRP finding would be
against the proxy service provider; not its customer. Just
something to consider . . . .<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Chris Pelling<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 01, 2014 5:29 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Valeriya Sherman; Kathy Kleiman;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Compilation of
P/P provider responses<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Hi Val,<br>
<br>
Kathy's words were : "I think disclosure to the Complainant
and the Forum would be sufficient to meet the needs of the
Complainant, and provide information that can be used for
both the formal dispute and perhaps an informal resolution."
which essentially means (if we are talking about the
National Arbitration Forum) this is filing a UDRP case.<br>
<br>
So disclosure is ONLY once UDRP has been filed, because we
are required to provide that information for the UDRP
process as the registrar under the RAA. Otherwise in all
fairness we will have "willy nilly" requests for information
from every tom, dick and harry. <br>
<br>
I totally agree with Kathy in that the PP service <i>should
not</i> be lifted until the UDRP decision/finding has been
completed - as at that point if the request has been found "<i>wanting</i>"
then the customer still has his privacy intact because the
UDRP panel has rejected the claim.<br>
<br>
The UDRP process cost is around $1500, I don't know what
lawyers charge on top mind you, but, if I had to protect my
IP, $1500 is something simple to find to protect it. You
have given certainly the view from the "person trying to get
the information" yet totally left out the "I want my privacy
protected". Let me give you a "way off" example and yes I
know this is way off.<br>
<br>
A "person" is being stalked, they move to get away from said
stalker, BUT, their domain is essential to their keeping,
the stalker only has to ask / request the PP service
provider for the information - and in your last paragraph
you suggest the information should be simply given over.<br>
<br>
I am sorry, but, thats wrong. It is not an attack on you
Val, and we have to think of the best routes for this. UDRP
means somebody adjudicates the request - THIS IS FAIR and
IMPARTIAL to both parties. If the PP customer is in the
wrong - fine, not only do they lose the case and the domain
- they lose the PP service as the domain is no longer
theirs.<br>
<br>
We can all go round and round in circles and be here all
year, the IP guys want the ability to simply ask for
information and be given it, let me put another thought out
there :<br>
<br>
A lawyer provides his customer a PP service, do you really
think that the lawyer will simply "give up" the customer
information if requested? They may well do, but, I would
lean on the side of "No, you cant have it as it is
attorney–client privilege" (I am not a lawyer, so that may
be the wrong term - but you get the idea) <br>
<br>
If the lawyer has a court order or subpoena then sure -
he/she will provide that info. I am suggesting the same, no
more, no less.<br>
<br>
In the UK, you are innocent until proven guilty, like most
places, so, why should someone's data be revealed unless it
has been requested/ruled by an authority/judge whatever.
At least with being requested LEGALLY like that, the data
protection act in the UK (where we are) allows us to provide
that information as we have a court order requesting it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">Chris<o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">On 30/09/2014
11:12 PM, Valeriya Sherman wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">We also
agree with the points raised by Todd and Kathy below.
Disclosure to a Requestor would avoid the more drastic
result of Publication associated with the filing of a
legal action, which could have negative consequences for
all parties.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">To echo
Todd's point below, Disclosure would help to
avoid unnecessary(and expensive) arbitration
or litigation. In the context of IP rights enforcement,
where many rights are territorial in nature, disclosure
of registrant contact information may be essential for a
Requestor to properly analyze whether a cause of action
exists or further proceedings are merited. In other
words, filing a UDRP or a court action without this
information is putting the cart before the horse -- it
entangles all three parties (Customer, P/P Provider, and
Requestor) in potentially premature legal action, that
could very well have been avoided
through disclosure of Customer information (e.g.,
jurisdiction) and/or direct communication between
Customer and Requestor. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Moreover, we
should keep in mind that many Requestors will be smaller
businesses and organizations, for which bringing an
expensive action without essential facts that could be
obtained through Disclosure would be extremely
burdensome, potentially to the point where they would be
unable to protect their rights against some
infringers -- a result fraught with anti-competitive and
anti-consumer implications. An effective and
fair accreditation regime should aim to prevent such a
result. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Val<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in">Valeriya
Sherman<br>
Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, L.L.P.<br>
1101 30th Street, N.W.<br>
Suite 120<br>
Washington, D.C. 20007<br>
Tel 202.944.3300<br>
Cell 303.589.7477<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:vsherman@law.gwu.edu"
target="_blank"><span style="color:#1155CC">vsherman@sgbdc.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:center"
align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%"></div>
<div id="divRpF205427">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
on behalf of Kathy Kleiman [<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kathy@kathykleiman.com">kathy@kathykleiman.com</a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:33 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Compilation
of P/P provider responses</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">A
Belated +1 to Todd's thoughtful analysis below. <br>
<br>
Although #1 (publication) does seem to be the
default for some re: UDRP filings, it does seem to
be intrinsically unfair to publish a Registrants
personal/organizational data to the world without at
least a *finding* of actual wrongdoing (not the
filing of the complaint in and of itself -- what
happens if it is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
decision, or a previous business partner sharing
rights to the same name...??)<br>
<br>
Here, I think disclosure to the Complainant and the
Forum would be sufficient to meet the needs of the
Complainant, and provide information that can be
used for both the formal dispute and perhaps an
informal resolution.<br>
<br>
I think Todd lays it out far more eloquently
below...<br>
Best,<br>
Kathy<br>
<br>
<br>
:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Thanks
Mary. One thought for the group to consider
(happy to discuss in more detail on the call):</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Reviewing
the attached, it seems as if there are basically
two alternatives for us to debate when it comes
to disclosure in the context of cybersquatting
and UDRPs (setting aside for now that there are
many abuses other than cybersquatting where
disclosure may be relevant):</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:1.0in;text-indent:-.25in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">1)</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times
New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D">
</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">One
alternative is for the p/p provider to simply
funnel those kinds of complaints into a UDRP.
This approach basically skips “disclosure” and
goes straight to “publication” – the attached
points out that most providers will publish all
contact information to the world once a UDRP is
filed.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:1.0in;text-indent:-.25in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">2)</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times
New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D">
</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">The other
alternative would require disclosure to the
complainant under certain enumerated
circumstances where the complainant provides
enough information to meet certain prima facie
elements (and makes certain averments under
penalty of perjury).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Based on
the attached, it seems that Option (1) is
currently the more common approach. But going
forward, isn’t Option (2) much better for the
consumers/beneficial users who purchase p/p
services? As Kathy and others have rightly
mentioned, publication (to the world) is a more
extreme deviation from the beneficial user’s
privacy expectations than is disclosure (to a
single complainant). So why would we adopt an
accreditation regime that skews the process
toward the more drastic result?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> f</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">One other
thought on this: in many cases disclosure may
obviate the need to file a UDRP at all. Maybe
the complainant can contact the beneficial user
to negotiate a resolution. Or maybe learning
the beneficial user’s identity will cause the
complainant to question its original analysis
that the domain name was being used in bad
faith. Whatever the reason, I would assume that
avoiding a UDRP is almost always going to be the
better option for ALL parties involved:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:87.75pt;text-indent:-.25in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#1F497D">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times
New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D">
</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">The
complainant gets to save the money that it would
otherwise spend on a UDRP.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:87.75pt;text-indent:-.25in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#1F497D">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times
New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D">
</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">The
beneficial user gets to avoid the more drastic
result of publication to the world.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:87.75pt;text-indent:-.25in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#1F497D">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times
New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D">
</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">The p/p
provider gets to avoid being named as a
respondent in a UDRP proceeding (which James
noted on our call can be problematic), and may
get to keep a paying customer that it would
otherwise lose once the UDRP is filed and the
contact information is published to the world.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">So if
everybody is better off under Option (2) than
Option (1), what I am missing? What is the
argument for Option (1)? And why is it the more
common approach used today (at least, according
to the responses compiled in the attached)?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Thanks.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><br>
Todd.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org"
target="_blank">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org"
target="_blank">mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mary Wong<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 25, 2014
7:36 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> PPSAI WG<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg]
Compilation of P/P provider responses</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Dear WG members,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Please find
attached a document that staff has
compiled of P/P provider responses to the
5 questions posed by the WG chairs to the
group after the call last week, as
follows:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">1.
What are provider practices regarding
customer notification when a disclosure
request is received, and is the customer
given the opportunity to respond? <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">2.
Does any provider offer its customer an
option other than disclosure or publication,
e.g. an opportunity to cancel the
registration instead (i.e. what some WG
members have mentioned as a “takedown”)?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">3.
What are provider “standards" for
determining disclosure to third parties? <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">4.
Can providers give the WG some general
information about the percentage of requests
for disclosure that are successful?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">5.
For Q4, do providers also have information
about the type of claims those relate to
e.g. If they are from LEA, 3P IP claim etc.?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Please let me
know if I have mischaracterized or omitted
any response that you may have sent (for
which I offer my apologies!). If you have
not yet provided a response and are in a
position to do so, or if you’d like to add
to a response you’d provided previously,
please send it along and I’ll make sure it
gets added to this document.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Finally, please
note that certain actual provider terms of
service obtained from a sample of
providers had previously been compiled as
part of the draft template for this
Category F, so that may also be helpful –
these are available on the WG wiki here: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://community.icann.org/x/QwbxAg"
target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/QwbxAg</a>.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Thanks and cheers</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Mary</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Mary Wong</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Senior Policy
Director</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names &
Numbers (ICANN)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Telephone: +1
603 574 4892</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt">Email: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org"
target="_blank">mary.wong@icann.org</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>