<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>Dear WG members,</div><div><br></div><div>Here is the latest version of the draft language that was discussed during the last (wrap up) session on Reveal. Please note that there is now a heading to the proposal using language provided by Kathy – to clarify that the proposal relates only to IP complaints for which certain specific details have been provided:</div><div><br></div><div><div><b>Suggestion (applicable only to IP complaints stated with great specificity including identity of the IP rights holder and complainant, the right(s) involved, and nature of the infringing activity):</b></div><div>- Provider to notify customer when it receives a Disclosure request.</div><div>- There should be a period (of X number of days?) for the customer to take action in response to the notification. This may take the form of a direct response to the requestor, a request to cancel its domain name registration, file with a court or other actions.</div><div>- Provider [may] [shall] proceed to Disclose if customer does not take responsive action within the specified time frame (but how would provider know that customer has done so? Perhaps require that customer acknowledges receipt of the notification and its intention to take action?)</div><div>- Any such Disclosure should be subject to reasonable limitations on the use of such Disclosed information.</div><div><br></div><div>Additional suggestion: create list of illustrative examples or "build out" a use case?</div></div><div><br></div></body></html>