<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>Dear WG members,</div><div><br></div><div>This is a <u>last call</u> for any issues that you would like to bring to the WG’s attention concerning Part 2 of the WG Public Comment Review Tool (first circulated on 10 August), similar to the approach we adopted for issue-spotting in Part 1. Please send these to the email list for consideration at the next WG call as soon as you can, but <b>no later than Monday</b> (a day before the call) if at all possible. </div><div><br></div><div>Please also find attached two documents - </div><div><br></div><div>(1) Part 3 of the WG Public Comment Review Tool, containing excerpts from public comments sent directly to the public comment forum and responses to the online questions template that cover all the WG's remaining preliminary recommendations aside from those being analyzed by the Sub Teams (i.e. Preliminary Recommendations #16-20); and</div><div><br></div><div>(2) Part 4 of the WG Public Comment Review Tool, containing those comments and suggestions made by commenters and template responders that were not specifically framed as responses to particular WG recommendations. Part 4 also contains two additional elements, viz. a list of the types of concerns raised by signatories to the Save Domain Privacy petition (much of which is also reflected in many of the general comments received in the public comment forum), and a list of commenters who supported or endorsed other commenters’ submissions. While this Part 4 may be of particular usefulness to Sub Team 4, we attach it here to facilitate the WG's review of all the remaining comments not otherwise summarized in other parts of the Tool.</div><div><br></div><div>These two documents are the last in the series of documents that comprise the WG’s Public Comment Review Tool for our Initial Report, not including the additional documents that were prepared for the various Sub Teams that will also form part of the record for the Final Report. I should point out that some of the comments in these two documents include some strong language, but we have chosen to leave them in as they were sent in the same way as comments that used less robust language; I hope that is all right. </div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div>Mary</div><div><br></div><div><div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Mary Wong</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Senior Policy Director</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Telephone: +1 603 574 4889</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Email: mary.wong@icann.org</font></font></div><div><br></div></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div><br></div><br></div></body></html>