<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><div><div>Hello Phil and everyone,</div><div><div><br></div>I went back and looked at the various iterations and evolution of the draft framework since it was first presented for discussion. I hope that my notes (below, in blue and bolded) are helpful to you and the rest of the WG in resolving the questions you raised.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks and cheers</div><div>Mary</div><div><br></div><div><div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Mary Wong</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Senior Policy Director</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Telephone: +1 603 574 4889</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Email: mary.wong@icann.org</font></font></div><div><br></div></div></div></div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> Phil Corwin <<a href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com">psc@vlaw-dc.com</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 11:49<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> Mary Wong <<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org">mary.wong@icann.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> RE: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for review on 3 November 2015<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:317654255;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1338572370 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:\F0B7;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:\F0A7;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:\F0B7;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:\F0A7;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:\F0B7;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:\F0A7;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:1390302841;
mso-list-template-ids:1709618178;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-tab-stop:1.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-tab-stop:2.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:3.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-tab-stop:4.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Following up on yesterday’s call, and amplifying/further explaining my oral comments in regard to the “Revised Illustrative Draft Disclosure Framework for Intellectual
Property Rights-holders” ---<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Section IIA, starting on page 2, addresses situations where “Where a domain name allegedly infringes a trademark” and thus coincides with scenarios
where a rights holder could employ the URS (at new gTLDs) or the UDRP (at all gTLDs; and noting that most ccTLDs have adopted similar arbitration procedures) as well as initiate litigation under applicable national laws. The ICANN-adopted RPMs allow an action
to be initiated even when the identity of the registrant is not known, and many national laws provide for
<i>In Rem</i> filings to address such circumstances.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Subsection 6a requires the rights holder (or its representative) seeking registrant disclosure to provide a good faith statement that “provides a
basis for reasonably believing that the use of the trademark in the domain name -i. allegedly infringes the trademark holder’s rights; and ii. is not defensible”.
<b>Some questions that may require clarifying modifications : 1) Does the phrase “use of the trademark in the domain name” mean that this process is only available where the actual trademark, and not an allegedly confusingly similar variant, constitutes the
domain name or is wholly incorporated within it? 2) Given that the rights holder is seeking a lifting of privacy protection chosen by the registrant, is it sufficient that its statement merely recite a basis for believing that the domain name “allegedly infringes”
its trademark or should there be a higher threshold – that is, a requirement that the statement allege that the use of the TM in the domain <u>actually</u> infringes its rights? 3) Does the phrase “is not defensible” mean that disclosure should only occur
(or at least be seriously considered) when the domain name presents a black-and-white, know-it-when-you-see-it scenario such as that for which the URS is designed? (Noting that in many UDRP cases a defense is raised, and where it is raised it is often successful.)(Further
noting that Section III.C.ii and iii allows the provider to refuse disclosure where it has a basis for reasonably believing that “use of the claimed intellectual property is<o:p></o:p></b></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraph"><b><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">defensible”.)</span></b></p></div></div></div></blockquote></span><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><b><font color="#0000ff">MW: The phrase “in the domain name” in Section IIA subsection 6(a) was inserted, to parallel the requirements for Sections IIB & IIC (where the infringement is not in the domain name but use of a copyright or trademark on a website) - in both the latter instances the alleged infringement is specifically tied to that use, whereas the original language in 6(a) merely said “use of a trademark” without a specific limitation. All three situations now require the same showing by the requester and the same good faith statement, including the reasonable belief that the customer’s use of the copyright or trademark in question “is not defensible”. The phrase “is not defensible” was in the original draft Framework document and has not changed since – but any change now will have to be made to all three sections/situations.</font></b></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Subsection 6b requires the rights holder or representative thereof to use the Customer’s contact details only for certain purposes, one of which is
“in a legal proceeding concerning the issue”. <b>Is it intended that a URS or UDRP filing fall within the meaning of “a legal proceeding”? If so, can that be clarified as some may assume it only references court proceedings?</b></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote></span><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><font color="#0000ff"><b>MW: This phrase has also been present since the original draft – should we add the clarification (again to apply to all three requester situations) that this “including a UDRP or URS filing”?</b></font></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Subsection 6c requires the Requestor’s statement that it “c) agrees that the Requestor will submit, without prejudice to other potentially applicable<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">jurisdictions, to the jurisdiction of the courts (1) where the trademark holder is incorporated and (2) where Provider is located for purposes of any
disputes arising from alleged improper disclosures caused by knowingly false statements made by the Requester, or from Requester’s knowing misuse of information disclosed to it in response to its request”.
<b>Given that the allegation of an infringing domain name may also be subject to a contemporaneous or subsequent URS or UDRP action, for the sake of completeness should this agreement be expanded to include submitting to the jurisdiction of an accredited dispute
resolution provider (DRP) based upon the applicable jurisdiction rules so that such bad conduct could be taken into account to find either abuse of the URS or attempted reverse domain name hijacking under the UDRP?</b></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote></span><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><font color="#0000ff"><b>MW: This new paragraph was added in the event that the WG agrees to adopt Option Two from the annex – as such, the final language (if any) of this paragraph will have to mirror the WG’s final agreement on the language for Option Two. Presumably this will be discussed and hopefully confirmed by the next call.</b></font></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><b><o:p></o:p></b></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><b><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Noting that, while the UDRP and URS are not always directly applicable, many of these same questions and requests for clarification arise in regard
to Section II.C (Domain name resolves to website where trademark is allegedly infringed).<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Section III.D states, “Disclosure cannot be refused solely for lack of any of the following: (i) a court order; (ii) a subpoena;
<b>(iii) a pending civil action; or (iv) a UDRP or URS proceeding</b>; nor can refusal to disclose be solely based on the fact that the Request is founded on alleged intellectual property infringement in content on a website associated with the domain name”.
<b>I take issue with the notion that the provider should still continue to determine whether to disclose the customer’s contact information where a related civil action for trademark infringement, or a URS or UDRP, have been initiated (presumably by the rights
holder, since it is unlikely that the customer would do so and thereby make its identity known, in which event further consideration of disclosure would be moot). The request for disclosure is based upon allegations of trademark infringement and a court and/or
accredited DRP have far greater expertise than a P/P provider to determine whether actual infringement exists. Given that disparity of expertise, my view is that the filing of such action by the rights holder should stay the disclosure request and relieve
the provider from any further obligation to decide on it. Allowing the process to continue could result in a situation where privacy is violated and the court or DRP subsequently finds no actual infringement.</b></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote></span><div><b><font color="#0000ff"><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">MW: The primary reason for the language in this section is to clarify what grounds cannot be used by a provider as a reason to refuse disclosure (e.g. there’s not been a UDRP filed so there is no reason for me to disclose that information). It doesn’t address the situation where there IS a UDRP (or other action) filed already – though perhaps in these situations there will likely be few situations where a requester would still need the customer’s details. Should we clarify this?</font></font></b></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><b><o:p></o:p></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Thank you for considering these questions and views as the WG moves toward a final version of this document.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Best to all,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Philip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">Virtualaw LLC</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">1155 F Street, NW</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">Suite 1050</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">Washington, DC 20004</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">202-559-8597/Direct</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">202-559-8750/Fax</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">202-255-6172/cell</span></b><b><span style="color:navy"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">Twitter: @VlawDC</span></b><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: navy;">"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey</span></i></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif;"> <a href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mary Wong<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, November 02, 2015 5:13 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Agenda and documents for review on 3 November 2015<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Dear WG members,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">The agenda for our next meeting, on Tuesday 3 November, is as follows.
<b>PLEASE NOTE THE UTC TIME CHANGE</b> due to daylight savings time in a number of countries – the call will be at 1500 UTC (07:00 PST, 10:00 EST, 15:00 London, 16:00 CET).<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><ol start="1" type="1"><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Roll call/updates to SOI<o:p></o:p></span></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Continued discussion of Illustrative Disclosure Framework (latest version attached – please also see the note below)<o:p></o:p></span></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Discussion of proposed revised text for de-accreditation (see attached draft text) and possible data escrow recommendation<o:p></o:p></span></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Next steps<o:p></o:p></span></li></ol><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">For agenda item #2, please note that the draft being circulated is still under discussion by Sub Team 3 and is subject to further revision and recommendations
by the group. As such, the “redlined” edits that were presented during the Dublin F2F meeting have been retained rather than “accepted” as changes. For your easier review, please note that the main changes since Dublin that incorporate the WG’s discussion
points and agreement in Dublin include: (1) clarification in Section III.A regarding an exception to disclosure in cases where personal safety is endangered; and (2) an addition to Section III.C (as sub-section (vii)) to clarify that providers will not need
to disclose if the verifiable evidence spelled out in Section II is not fully produced by the requester.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">In addition, this current draft includes new language on dispute resolution (see, e.g., Section II.A(6)(c)). The new language was inserted to cover what has been
termed “Option 2” in the annex, concerning dispute resolution in the event of disclosure due to improper requests. The Sub Team acknowledges that while this topic was discussed briefly in Dublin, there was no WG agreement on a specific recommendation. The
new language in the current draft document – as well as specific edits to the “annex” containing Options One and Two – reflects a suggestion by some Sub Team members to adopt Option Two. This suggestion, which may not reflect the view of all Sub Team members
as it is still being discussed, is nevertheless being presented to the full WG for further consideration.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Thanks and cheers<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Mary<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Mary Wong<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Senior Policy Director<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Telephone: +1 603 574 4889<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">Email:
<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org">mary.wong@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;"><hr size="1" width="100%" noshade="" style="color:#A0A0A0" align="center"></span></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: black;">No virus found in this message.<br>
Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a><br>
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4450/10889 - Release Date: 10/25/15<br>
Internal Virus Database is out of date.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote></span></body></html>