<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    But this is creating a "strict liability standard." That's not
    fair.  Further, your lawyer is not taking on that responsibility...
    and neither should a grandmother registering for a grandchild. <br>
    Kathy<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/16/2015 4:50 PM, Susan Kawaguchi
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:D26F8F31.11778%25susank@fb.com" type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div>No not talking about changing anything about the UDRP or URS
        just using that as an example if it is an unaccredited proxy
        vendor then they will be held responsible for the same
        liabilities any registrant is held to.    No chance of them
        saying “sorry not my domain name here is the “true” registrant
        contact info”    </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
        <div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt;
          text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none;
          BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT:
          0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid;
          BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
          <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>&lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org</a></a>&gt;
          on behalf of Kathy Kleiman &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:kathy@kathykleiman.com">kathy@kathykleiman.com</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Monday, November
          16, 2015 at 11:00 AM<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a></a>"
          &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re:
          [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Accredited proxy providers vs unaccredited
          proxy providers<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">Susan,<br>
            Are we talking about changing the way UDRP and URS handle
            privacy/proxy situations? I think that is outside of the
            scope of this WG.<br>
            Best,<br>
            Kathy<br>
            <br>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/16/2015 12:34 PM, Susan
              Kawaguchi wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote cite="mid:D26F5386.115CF%25susank@fb.com"
              type="cite">
              <div>Hello All, </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I have given more thought about  the discussion
                concerning  accredited proxy vendors versus all other
                unaccredited proxy vendors, including lawyers.   It
                seems to me that we are never going to be able to
                capture each variation of the unaccredited proxy vendor
                and James brought up a point that I think we should
                consider.  </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>If accredited proxy vendors adhere to all the
                requirements we are describing they will have the
                benefit of not being considered the registrant of the
                domain name.  </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Any other type of unaccredited proxy service should
                simply not exist and they should always be considered
                the registrant with all the rights and liabilities that
                go along with being the registrant.  We simply would not
                recognize any other existing relationship.  </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>We could make this very clear Accredited proxy or
                registrant and not delve into all the grey areas.    </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>The unaccredited proxy provider would be considered
                the Registrant in all actions including the URS and
                UDRP.  </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I am hoping we can discuss further on the call
                tomorrow. </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Best, </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Susan Kawaguchi</div>
              <div>Facebook, Inc. </div>
              <br>
              <br>
              <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
              <br>
              <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org">Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org</a><a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dppsai-2Dpdp-2Dwg&amp;d=CwMD-g&amp;c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&amp;r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&amp;m=yaCFHlJwGL7WuzkX8kdcWVKsIxecGu1mmukVtYDltpY&amp;s=nJwx4-x6eBns7DZPfhKDrz9muSzGGPUBIxcTMoX_IkU&amp;e=">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg</a></pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </span>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>