[gnso-rds-pdp-data] Analysis....

Sun Apr 10 14:20:05 UTC 2016

Hi All,

I reviewed the following documents:

- WHOIS Task Force Final Report (2003)
- WHOIS Task Force Final Report (2007)
- EWG Recommendations for a Next-Generation RDS
- EWG Tutorial
- EWG FAQs
- Video FAQ: What is the RDS minimum public data set

I have attached my summary in a document as there was quite a lot to review and put on paper.

Kind Regards,
Vlad Dinculescu

> On 09 Apr 2016, at 11:06 PM, Holly Raiche via gnso-rds-pdp-data <gnso-rds-pdp-data at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alex
> 
> I think we are on the same page
> 
> I have already sent an email to this group on my response to three SAC reports, including SAC54 - it should be in people’s mailboxes.  If not, I”ll resend the email.
> 
> Holly
> On 10 Apr 2016, at 2:47 am, Deacon, Alex <Alex_Deacon at mpaa.org <mailto:Alex_Deacon at mpaa.org>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Holly, 
>> 
>>> On Apr 9, 2016, at 12:19 AM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net <mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> First - thanks Alex for looking.  The documents you found will be a part of the response to the final part of the question - what data elements should be disclosed.
>> 
>> Just to be clear I was focused on the specific question of what data elements should be collected, stored and disclosed.   
>> 
>>> 
>>> And I must disagree with Stephanie’s comment that the focus is not on individual data items (sorry if I am misquoting).  My understanding is that our starting point IS each and every bit of data that is collected.  From there, we can work through why it is collected - its purpose - and then what should/should not be stored, and then accessed, by whom and in what circumstances.
>> 
>> This was my comment not Stephanie’s comment.  Again i only looked at these three docs with the data question in mind so as Stephanie’s dissent was focused on the other questions (i.e. non data questions) there wasn’t much to report back to this (the data) group.  If I’ve misunderstood the task at hand please let me know...
>> 
>>> 
>>> Again, SAC 54 is one of the best sources to start with - all of the data collected, and for what purpose is there.  The other document that I should go through is the EWG since it was a really in depth look at the data collected and stored - before working out who should/should not have access and in what circumstances
>> 
>> Yes, and I see you singed up to analyze this doc for the data team - so we should be well covered!
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> HOlly
>>> On 9 Apr 2016, at 8:59 am, Deacon, Alex via gnso-rds-pdp-data <gnso-rds-pdp-data at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-data at icann.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,  
>>>> 
>>>> My analysis of the following 3 documents.    
>>>> 
>>>> Question: What data elements should be collected, stored and disclosed?
>>>> 
>>>> Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on ICANN, human rights and the rule of law
>>>> 
>>>> This document does not make any specific statements regarding the collection, storage and disclosure of user data elements.    It does however make one very general statement in paragraph 3 that is germane to “disclosure” of information , e.g. 
>>>> 
>>>> "In certain criminal investigations, criminal justice authorities need to secure evidence on computer systems and to identify offenders, subject to the conditions and safeguards providing for the adequate protection of human rights pursuant to Article 15 of the Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)."    
>>>> 
>>>> In addition, this document references two additional documents that I did not review but may be relevant
>>>> Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (ETS No. 108)
>>>> Article 15 of the Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)
>>>> 
>>>> Dissenting Report from Stephanie Perrin (24 Jun 2014)
>>>> 
>>>> The focus of this document is not on the specifics of individual data elements but on topics more relevant to the other sub groups.   
>>>> 
>>>> There are however two mentions of data elements on page one.   Specifically
>>>> Legal Contact Email and Legal Contact Phone Number
>>>> Registrant Address, Registrant Phone Number
>>>> It is important to note however that these mentions occur in a section where the author (Stephanie) states that she does not agree with the consensus of the EWG Final Report.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Process Framework for a PDP on Next-Generation RDS
>>>> 
>>>> This document does not make any specific statements regarding the collection, storage and disclosure of user data elements. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-data mailing list
>>>> gnso-rds-pdp-data at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-data at icann.org>
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-data <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-data>
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-data mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-data at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-data

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-data/attachments/20160410/e9a7a44e/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RDS Data Inputs.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 132848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-data/attachments/20160410/e9a7a44e/RDSDataInputs-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-data/attachments/20160410/e9a7a44e/attachment-0003.html>