[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Global Data Protections Laws - a rapidly growing number

Farell Folly farellfolly at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 03:21:41 UTC 2016


Sorry Cake, I see.

I went too far too fast.

Le lundi 4 avril 2016, David Cake <davecake at gmail.com> a écrit :

>
> On 3 Apr 2016, at 7:57 PM, Farell Folly via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <
> gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org');>> wrote:
>
>    1.
>    2. Most of the grounds are related to the user consent while  one
>    explicitly recommends to make some balance tests : necessity against data
>    subject freedom or right to protection against freedom of expression.
>    3. *All the documents provided by most of us are mostly dealing with
>    "what information can be accessed and why", but according to EWG final
>    report data privacy/protection should also address mechanisms (systems,
>    equipements, procedures) to implement to ensure. That is the HOW (to access
>    and to ensure that information is accessed in the right manner)*.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My suggestion : is let's brainstorm (may be too late) about
>
>    - what information is required for a domain name management  :
>    efficiency, traceability, openness ?
>    - what information really needs to be public : in my opinion, if
>    somebody does not hold a domain name, I don't know why it should access
>    somebody else's domain name information by only using WHOIS (unless the
>    intended recipient explictly wishes it so). If a lawyer, for any legal
>    purpose, wants to access a registrant's WHOIS information, I am pretty sure
>    that there is legal reason and in this case the associated
>    registrar/registry has the information to provide; so the lawyer does need
>    a WHOIS request to access all the registrant's info. Necessity must always
>    be proved before somebody uses WHOIS to access such an information. And
>    when a registrant A is allowed to access registrant B's information, the
>    reverse should be true.
>
>
> Please remember that this group is strictly focussed on dealing with
> documentation. I thought Kathys suggestions are very useful documents, but
> the purpose of this group is to help make those documents accessible to the
> wider working group - so if you think these documents are useful, please
> summarise why and leave it at that for now, the questions you are asking
> above are the sort of deliberative questions that should be addressed by
> the whole WG not this sub-group.
>
> David
>
>

-- 
Meilleures salutations,

--ff--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160404/63fcef77/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list