[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Checklist and summaries

[Sana Ali]

Hello All, 

I shall review the 5 common Positions by the International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications and Media Documents.  Will have these in by the end of tomorrow. I can also cover Article 29 WP comments on the data protection impact of the revision of the ICANN RAA concerning accuracy and data retention of WHOIS 2012 (2docs).

Warm wishes,
Sana Ali
sana.ali2030 at gmail.com <mailto:sana.ali2030 at gmail.com>
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/sanaali2030 <https://ca.linkedin.com/in/sanaali2030>





> On Apr 5, 2016, at 1:25 PM, David Cake via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> You beat me to sending that out by seconds, Lisa. 
> 
> And Stacie Walsh has volunteered to summarise
> Article 29 WP on ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (3 docs)
> Article 29 WP Opinion on the application of the data protection principles to WHOIS directories (1 doc)
> Thank you Stacie!
> 
> David
> 
> 
>> On 6 Apr 2016, at 1:18 AM, Lisa Phifer via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>> As requested during today's WG call, attached is the 4 April version of this checklist.
>> 
>> At 09:25 AM 4/5/2016, David Cake via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
>>> Staff has helpfully prepared a checklist of documents for the team so far, which is attached. I’ve very much appreciated the contribution of those who have suggested additional documents, and please feel free to suggest more, but with an eye to wrapping up this work fairly quickly, we should begin to focus more on summarisation of documents. You can see on this checklist there are quite a few still to be summarised. We will further be talking about this on todays call.
>>> 
>>> Please volunteer to summarise documents if you can. Summaries should be short and to the point, and your summary should include which aspects of that document you feel are relevant to privacy considerations and why (some documents may also be relevant to other aspects of the WGs work). If you disagree with a summary presented by another, please don’t try to engage in prolonged discussion on the WG - if you think the summary is misleading or lacking please attempt your own summary and we can attempt some synthesis, if you have a more substantive issue then it is probably best addressed during deliberations of the entire WG.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
>>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
>> <Input-Checklist-Privacy 4 April 2016.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160406/4c366d5d/attachment.html>