[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Privacy Team Checklist - 6 April

[Stephanie Perrin]

Thanks Lisa, there is a redundancy, in that the global table I sent you 
(SSRN article by Greenleaf) is the same as the one Kathy resent which 
appears below it.
In his 2014 book on asian privacy laws, which I did not send as it is 
hardcover only, there is an excellent chapter on how to evaluate/compare 
privacy laws, which has always been a puzzle for WHOIS discussions.  I 
could summarize that but probably not distribute a scanned copy, however 
graham is a great advocate for access so if interested I could pester 
him and see if he has an electronic version.
cheers stephanie

On 2016-04-06 10:39, Lisa Phifer via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Today's updated privacy team checklist (attached) was just posted to 
> the wiki at:
> https://community.icann.org/x/p4xlAw
>
> Just follow the link above if you're looking for the latest daily 
> update of any team's checklist.
>
> In today's checklist update, to make it clearer which docs are not yet 
> assigned, I have removed the ? names from the "Reviewed by" column. As 
> you can see, there are still plenty of docs identified by this team 
> over the past week or so that could still use volunteers to review 
> them. For those not certain how much work is involved: summaries 
> should be concise - for example, "executive summaries" that point the 
> WG to the portions of the document most relevant to RDS privacy and why.
>
> Best, Lisa
>
>
> At 11:49 AM 4/5/2016, David Cake via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
>
>
>> Please find attached a summary of the proposed plan to finish the 
>> sub-teams input summarising work as presented on todays call. Weâ?Td 
>> like to get this document summarising work done (of course, we know 
>> other relevant documents may be published from here on, but we can 
>> handle those as the come) so we can get back to full WG mode and 
>> start proceeding with the rest of the work plan.
>>
>> So what we are asking of you now is:
>>
>> Please look at the input checklist provided, choose at least one 
>> input (ideally one that has not been looked at yet) that you are 
>> wiling to summarise, and email the whole group to let them know that 
>> you are working on it. Aim to have these summaries done by Monday.
>> Please try to do this by the end of Wednesday.
>>
>> This doesnâ?Tt mean that we are necessarily done with identification 
>> of new inputs - if you have someone else valuable to add, feel free 
>> to continue to do so. But the focus should now be on summarising what 
>> we have.
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160406/40ff14bd/attachment.html>