[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Privacy Team Checklist - 6 April

Wed Apr 6 17:03:27 UTC 2016

Thank you, Lisa, I think the individuals articles are important to point 
out separately from the whole book.
Would you like me to summarize them?
Best,
Kathy

On 4/6/2016 12:58 PM, Lisa Phifer via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
> Thanks Stephanie. I had noticed that Kathy suggested the same 
> Greenleaf book that you had, but thought it important to add the 
> article about the tables also cited by Kathy. That's why the checklist 
> contains both:
>
> * Global Tables (2015, abstract and PDF download here: 
> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603502 
> <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603502>) and
>
> * Article about the Global Tables (2015, abstract and PDF download 
> here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603529 
> <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603529>)
>
> Please let me know if that doesn't clear up the apparent redundancy. 
> No doubt it would be useful for the same person to review/summarize 
> both together for the privacy team, since the article discusses recent 
> updates to the table and the trends behind them.
>
> FYI, Greenleaf's 2014 book is available commercially as an e-book - 
> see https://books.google.com/books?id=0eAuBQAAQBAJ 
> <https://books.google.com/books?id=0eAuBQAAQBAJ> . Since we don't have 
> public access to it, perhaps you could summarize the chapter you found 
> useful? Doing that now would at least help the WG remember this 
> resource exists when the time comes for detailed analysis of privacy laws.
>
> Best, Lisa
>
>
> At 09:23 AM 4/6/2016, Stephanie Perrin via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
>> Thanks Lisa, there is a redundancy, in that the global table I sent 
>> you (SSRN article by Greenleaf) is the same as the one Kathy resent 
>> which appears below it.
>> In his 2014 book on asian privacy laws, which I did not send as it is 
>> hardcover only, there is an excellent chapter on how to 
>> evaluate/compare privacy laws, which has always been a puzzle for 
>> WHOIS discussions. I could summarize that but probably not distribute 
>> a scanned copy, however graham is a great advocate for access so if 
>> interested I could pester him and see if he has an electronic version.
>> cheers stephanie
>>
>> On 2016-04-06 10:39, Lisa Phifer via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Today's updated privacy team checklist (attached) was just posted to 
>>> the wiki at:
>>> https://community.icann.org/x/p4xlAw 
>>> <https://community.icann.org/x/p4xlAw>
>>>
>>> Just follow the link above if you're looking for the latest daily 
>>> update of any team's checklist.
>>>
>>> In today's checklist update, to make it clearer which docs are not 
>>> yet assigned, I have removed the ? names from the "Reviewed by" 
>>> column. As you can see, there are still plenty of docs identified by 
>>> this team over the past week or so that could still use volunteers 
>>> to review them. For those not certain how much work is involved: 
>>> summaries should be concise - for example, "executive summaries" 
>>> that point the WG to the portions of the document most relevant to 
>>> RDS privacy and why.
>>>
>>> Best, Lisa
>>>
>>>
>>> At 11:49 AM 4/5/2016, David Cake via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Please find attached a summary of the proposed plan to finish the 
>>>> sub-teams input summarising work as presented on todays call. 
>>>> Weâ?Td like to get this document summarising work done (of course, 
>>>> we know other relevant documents may be published from here on, but 
>>>> we can handle those as the come) so we can get back to full WG mode 
>>>> and start proceeding with the rest of the work plan.
>>>>
>>>> So what we are asking of you now is:
>>>>
>>>> Please look at the input checklist provided, choose at least one 
>>>> input (ideally one that has not been looked at yet) that you are 
>>>> wiling to summarise, and email the whole group to let them know 
>>>> that you are working on it. Aim to have these summaries done by 
>>>> Monday.
>>>> Please try to do this by the end of Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>> This doesnâ?Tt mean that we are necessarily done with 
>>>> identification of new inputs - if you have someone else valuable to 
>>>> add, feel free to continue to do so. But the focus should now be on 
>>>> summarising what we have.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
>>>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org>
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy 
>>>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
>>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy 
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy> 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160406/1bab1059/attachment-0001.html>