[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Updated EU Privacy and Data Protection Rules

Mon Apr 18 23:39:15 UTC 2016

Hi Ayden,

I am not aware of a subscription that ICANN has to this service, but even if
we did, I am assuming it would not be allowed to share their documents on a
publicly archived mailing list? I am happy to explore their conditions
further if you and others think it is worth doing so.

Best regards,

Marika 

From:  <gnso-rds-pdp-privacy-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Ayden Fabien
Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com>
Date:  Monday 18 April 2016 at 16:00
To:  Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
Cc:  Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Updated EU Privacy and Data Protection
Rules

Hi, team-

Speaking of these new EU data protection rules, I just thought I'd ask if we
had access to a resource.

Over the weekend I stumbled across this email chain
<https://links1.mixmaxusercontent.com/aMjjKHWxnLSD3SEwj/l/z8S6xhR0z4mVyO66a?
rn=gI5NWY2lmcw1CckBXLzRmct82cudkI&re=IyZy9mLu5WYjlGQ5NWY2lmcw1CckBXLzRmct82c
udmI>  on the listserv for another working group. In it, the VP UN and IGO
Engagement shares a file downloaded from Cullen's regulatory intelligence
service. I wasn't aware that ICANN subscribed to Cullen, but in the file
shared there is a hyperlink to a full summary of the General Data Protection
Regulation that Cullen has prepared. It is behind their paywall, but if
ICANN subscribes to this service, might it be possible for us to table their
summary? I have read other reports produced by Cullen and they are usually
of a very high quality and may help us identify where, within the 400 pages
or so of this new regulation, we should be focusing our energy. I am not
sure of the terms of ICANN's subscription to this tool, so perhaps we cannot
share it publicly, but just thought I would ask. Thank you.

Best wishes,

Ayden

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 10:45 PM, Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels at gmail.com
wrote:
> So the updated EU data protection and privacy regulations are now agreed.
> Some rules include: ³.......
> 
> * - a right to be forgotten,
> * 
> * - ³clear and affirmative consent² to the processing of private data by the
> person concerned,
> * 
> * - a right to transfer your data to another service provider,
> * 
> * - the right to know when your data has been hacked,
> * 
> * - ensuring that privacy policies are explained in clear and understandable
> language, and
> * 
> * - stronger enforcement and fines up to 4% of firms' total worldwide annual
> turnover, as a deterrent to breaking the rules
> * 
> * .......²
> 
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20160407IPR21776/Data-protecti
> on-reform-Parliament-approves-new-rules-fit-for-the-digital-era
> 
> -Carlton
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
> 
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:33 PM, nathalie coupet via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
> <gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org> wrote:
>> Hi Lisa,
>> 
>> Here is the final summary.
>> 
>> Best,
>>  
>> Nathalie 
>> 
>> 
>> On Monday, April 18, 2016 2:27 PM, nathalie coupet <nathaliecoupet at yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Lisa,
>> 
>> Will do.
>>  
>> Nathalie 
>> 
>> 
>> On Monday, April 18, 2016 2:12 PM, Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Nathalie,
>> 
>> I suspect that you may have copied the text below from the PPSAI PDP report
>> (summarized by Steve Metalitz) instead of the survey you'd volunteered to
>> summarize:
>> 
>> EWG Research: WHOIS Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Practices Survey
>> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/45744698/EWG%20PP%20PROVIDE
>> R%20QUESTIONNAIRE%20SUMMARY%2014%20March%202014.pdf>
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/45744698/EWG%20PP%20PROVIDER
>> %20QUESTIONNAIRE%20SUMMARY%2014%20March%202014.pdf
>> 
>>  
>> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/45744698/EWG%20PP%20PROVIDE
>> R%20QUESTIONNAIRE%20SUMMARY%2014%20March%202014.pdf> Please take another look
>> at the above survey and summarize what it attempted to examine. While it may
>> not be reasonable to try to concisely summarize survey findings, it would be
>> very helpful to let the WG know what this survey asked privacy and proxy
>> providers about.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Lisa
>> 
>> 
>> At 08:30 AM 4/18/2016, you wrote:
>>> Here are my summaries.
>>> 
>>> Privacy and Proxy Services
>>> P/P services should remain available to registrants irrespective of their
>>> status as commercial or non-commercial organizations or as individuals.
>>> Further, P/P registrations should not be limited to private individuals who
>>> use their domains for non-commercial purposes....
>>> P/P customer data is to be validated and verified in a manner consistent
>>> with the requirements outlined in the WHOIS Accuracy Program Specification
>>> of the 2013 RAA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
>> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160418/6ee3359f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4599 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160418/6ee3359f/smime-0001.p7s>