[Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Docs most relevant in our Privacy Subgroup summary

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Mon Apr 25 13:23:05 UTC 2016


Could we please clarify 1) why we are picking our top 5 and 2) what we 
mean by relevant?  if we are evaluating ICANN's role as a data 
controller in dictating the collection, use, and disclosure of 
information, the 2013 RAA is probably the most relevant document.  IF we 
are trying to help colleagues from different backgrounds understand what 
we are talking about in terms of data protection, Kathy's list is an 
excellent one.  We need both, in my view.  Hence my slowness in getting 
off the mark, I am confused.

cheers Stephanie


On 2016-04-25 15:19, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> I think ‘relevant’ is a key word, a point that Lisa made to the 
> leadership team a few days ago.
>
> Chuck
>
> *From:*gnso-rds-pdp-privacy-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-privacy-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kathy 
> Kleiman
> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2016 9:03 AM
> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy] Docs most relevant in our Privacy 
> Subgroup summary
>
> Hi All,tand
> I think we have been asked for our list of the most relevant documents 
> for the Working Group from our Privacy subgroup. It is hard to choose 
> from the excellent list and summaries prepared!
>
> My thoughts are that the documents below provide the best overview of 
> pivotal legal principles of data protection, show the enormous spread 
> of these principles around the world (particularly recently), and give 
> us guidance for interpretation of these principles (including what it 
> means to be a "data controller" and requires) are below.
>
> Best regards,
> Kathy
>
> In answer to subgroup question "(ii) Which inputs are likely to be the 
> most important [relevant] during WG deliberations and why?", I share:
>
> 1) The EU Data Protection Directive 1995 (the best known of all data 
> protection laws; the legal obligations of all countries in the EU)
> 2) The Council of Europe's Treaty 108 on Data Protection (created in 
> 1981, and signed about 47 countries within and outside the EU, this is 
> a key founding document of comprehensive data protection laws)
>
> 3) Professor Greenleaf's two articles (part of the same book) set out 
> his studies showing that the adoption of data protection laws is 
> growing rapidly -- and in 2015 the number of countries with 
> comprehensive data protection laws surpassed those without data 
> protections laws. More than a majority of the countries of the world 
> have now adopted comprehensive data protection laws and legal frameworks.
>
> 4) Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner (2015)/EU-US Privacy Shield 
> (2016) - very recent cases and agreements which clearly show that 
> rigorous enforcement of EU data protection laws is on the rise by high 
> courts and their decisions are forcing new agreements to be negotiated 
> which raise the legal requirements for transferring data from the EU 
> countries to other parts of the world. The new EU-U.S. Privacy Shield 
> is an important example of these higher legal requirements. The 
> Article 29 Working Party Opinion on the Privacy Shield -- only about 
> two weeks old -- is important for its discussion of these newest of 
> major legal data protection frameworks.
>
> 5) Opinion 2/2003 on the Application of the Data Protection Principles 
> to the Whois directories is the Article 29 Working Party's opinion 
> expressly guiding ICANN on how to apply data protection laws and 
> frameworks to the Whois issues. What could be more "on point" for our 
> full Working Group's work?
>
> 6) McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, a decision in 1995 by the US 
> Supreme Court, affirming the importance of anonymous speech in 
> creating an avenue for important, but unpopular and minority ideas to 
> enter into a country's robust political, cultural and artistic 
> discussions. In this decision, the US Supreme Court found that 
> anonymity speech is a protected under the US First Amendment and a 
> person cannot be forced to put her/his name and address on all of 
> statements.
>
> Best regards,
> Kathy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
> Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy/attachments/20160425/9d30c827/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list