[gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Purpose Document Review: EWG Tutorial & FAQ

Prosser, Susan susan at domaintools.com
Fri Apr 15 19:31:59 UTC 2016


Hello team,
Sincere apologies for the tardiness of the two of the final review
documents.  Below are the EWG Tutorial and FAQ content related to Purpose.


EWG Tutorial, Pages 17-20, 37-41



http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-ewg-final-overview/presentation-ewg-final-overview-23jun14-en.pdf



Associated audio & transcript:

http://audio.icann.org/meetings/london2014/ewg-final-overview-23jun14-en.mp3

https://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-ewg-final-overview/transcript-ewg-final-overview-23jun14-en



Page 17

This page presents the purposes surfaced through EWG work.  It is noted in
the audio and on the presentation the purposes presented may not meet *all*
use cases.   Any solution must be flexible to allow for future purpose
needs.



Page 18

Recognition is made every permissible purpose as data needs, but they
vary.  Some may be widely used with minimal control standards whereas
others will require higher scrutiny and authority for access. Also
introduced are the potential provisions for whowas (history) or reverse
(related domains) queries.



Page 19

Purpose based contact (PBC) is a proposal to offer better control of
personal information and more efficient portability of contact data.



Page 20

Workflow example of Gate access in a legal action is presented.  It walks
through how the process would operate with authentication service.   If the
requestor was authorized for access and to what level, then provide data
only relevant to their need and their approval level.



Page 21

Presentation page contains what could be in PBC data, noting that PBC may
still be a proxy service.  It offers users choices to determine what they
want for contact information, what information willing to share at what
level, and ability to update information once not across multiple
platforms.





(not on audio or transcript I could find):

Page 38

Provides a chart with identified Purpose and associated Task for each.



Page 39

Purposed Based Contacts (PBC) examples are provided as backup to the
presentation.  The EWG supplied three specific examples of use as
Individual using own data, Individual or Org using a Privacy service and a
Business using 3rd party PBC.



Page 40

The table of Purposes and Needs is provided as backup to the presentation.
The table defines the query scope, type of contacts needed based on
purpose, registrant data availability level and other queries that may be
needed for specific purposes, such as Reverse and WhoWas.



Page 41

The PBC and their responsibilities are defined and provided as backup to
the presentation.  These are the proposed referenced throughout the
presentation.





~~~~~

Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (EWG) Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs) – 2014 Final Report Update

https://community.icann.org/display/EWG/EWG+FAQs



Five (5) FAQ’s specifically addressed Purpose, captured below. (Page 5)



*Registration Data Users and Purposes *

9) Who are the users of the RDS? How did the EWG determine this?

The EWG analyzed previous reports and use cases to identify users who want
access to gTLD registration data, including registrants, protected
registrants, on-line service providers, business Internet users,
intellectual property owners, law enforcement agencies and OpSec staff,
Internet technical staff, individual Internet users, Internet researchers,
non-LEA investigators of malicious activity, the general public, and bad
actors.



10) Why do those users need access to registration data?

Use cases also shed light on rationale and purposes served by gTLD
registration data, including domain name control, regulatory/contract
enforcement, academic/public interest domain name research, domain name
purchase/sale, personal data protection, individual Internet use, technical
issue resolution, domain name certification, legal action, regulatory and
contractual enforcement, criminal investigation and DNS abuse mitigation,
DNS transparency, and malicious Internet activities.



11) Which purposes should not be permissible?

Given no rationale for accommodating the needs of some users but not others
that access WHOIS today, the EWG recommended the RDS accommodate all
non-malicious uses.



12) Why didn’t the EWG consider user X or purpose Y?

Use cases examined by the EWG were not exhaustive, but representative
enough of existing and potential uses to establish RDS needs. The EWG also
recommended a process for adding new purposes as may be required to address
future global Internet needs.



67) How will members of the press and bloggers gain access to RDS data?

The DNS Transparency purpose was intended to cover media needs for
registration data. However, if the data available for that permissible
purpose does not prove sufficient, the EWG also recommended an on-going
process for users to suggest new permissible purposes.




~~~~
Susan Prosser
VP, Client Services
DomainTools, LLC

T: (206) 838-9060
E: susan at domaintools.com
PGP:  A2C4D2A4
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-purpose/attachments/20160415/ae5c9ce3/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-purpose mailing list