[gnso-rds-pdp-purpose] Team outputs - Summaries

[Susan Kawaguchi]

During the 20 April RDS PDP WG call, each team will be asked to report on its progress and share preliminary thoughts about the questions posed during last week?s WG call. To kick-start this discussion, I ask that each of you try to answer this question:

Which top 5 inputs summarized by this team are likely to be the most helpful to this PDP and why?


For example, does the input define potential requirements that this WG should take into consideration during phase 1 of this PDP? Does the input identify dependencies that will shape our work plan?

The following are personal choices and I am using these as an example of what we need to discuss BUT each sub team member needs to provide their input.

WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-11may12-en.pdf> (2012)

SAC055, WHOIS: Blind Men and an Elephant<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-055-en.pdf> (September 2012)


EWG Recommendations for a Next-Generation RDS<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf>, especially

-        Section 3, Users and Purposes

-        Annex C, Example Use Cases

Annex A, Board Questions

    Registrar Accreditation Agreement<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en> (2013)

Our team will have an opportunity to share initial answers during the WG call. Please reply to this list today with your own initial thoughts so that we can prepare to contribute to discussion during the WG call. We will not be expected to have a team-agreed answer this week, but we need to at least begin this discussion.Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org <Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org>

Looking forward to a lively discussion.
Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-purpose/attachments/20160419/9c91e722/attachment-0001.html>