[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Wed Aug 17 13:26:32 UTC 2016


To give the proper context, for those not on the call or who have not listened to the recording, I want to call attention to the last added sentence: "Note that this problem statement is meant as a tool to aid in discussion, consistent with but not a constraint on the Working Group and its Charter."

Chuck

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Phifer
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 2:35 AM
To: RDS PDP WG
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

Dear all,

Attached please find a redlined version of the problem statement produced by the drafting team for WG review. This redline includes edits discussed during today's WG call.

Action item: WG to review redline version of the problem statement and share any further comments/edits with the mailing list ahead of next week's meeting.

Thank you to the drafting team for their work, and to all WG members for reviewing the attached redline with the goal of finalizing this statement on the next WG call.

Best,
Lisa

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160817/0903a2d7/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list