[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

[Gomes, Chuck]

Rob,

Are you suggesting that registrants do not have a vested interest in an RDS system?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Rob Golding
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 11:11 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

> Consumers, the domain name industry, governments, intellectual property owners, and registrants all have a vested interest in an RDS system which contains accurate and complete registration data, and which is secure, resilient, accessible, auditable, and performs well. 
> Additionally, some registrants desire anonymity and their requirements 
> regarding data collection and data access may be at odds with others

I think we need to expand the "2nd set" (and remove registrants from the 1st set) Something more like :
Additionally, Registrants have a right to privacy and a right (locale dependant) to control over access to their data, so their requirements may be at odds with others.


Rob


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg