[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement

[Stephanie Perrin]

Gac represents government, not the judiciary. In most countries there is 
a difference.   I like mitigate in your list of verbs.

Stephanie Perrin


On 2016-08-23 11:39, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
>
> Sara’s redline is more constrained but does it omit our main job, 
> which is to resolve/manage/accommodate/mitigate the divergent and 
> sometimes contradictory interests in RDS which the earlier draft 
> rather succinctly identified?   (I realize all those verbs are 
> different, and not sure which is the best.)
>
> If the “core problem” is really to “account for rules, regulations and 
> laws” then should the job be turned over to the GAC which after all 
> represents the sources and authoritative interpreters of those “rules, 
> regulations and laws”?   I doubt that would be a satisfactory way to 
> proceed.
>
> *image001*
>
> *Steven J. Metalitz *|***Partner, through his professional corporation*
>
> T: 202.355.7902 |met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>**
>
> *Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp**LLP*|*www.msk.com <http://www.msk.com/>*
>
> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
>
> *_THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY 
> FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED 
> RECIPIENTS._**THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, 
> AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS 
> MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY 
> REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS 
> STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR 
> TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM 
> YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.*
>
> *From:*gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Sullivan
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:44 AM
> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem 
> Statement
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:42:17PM +0000, Sara Bockey wrote:
> >
> > The problem statement should be explicit and to the point, without 
> extraneous wording or viewpoints. Accordingly, my proposed revisions 
> are attached.
> >
>
> I think this is vastly better because it is more constrained.
>
> A
>
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160823/f022c17f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2772 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160823/f022c17f/attachment.gif>