[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem Statement
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Tue Aug 23 17:43:30 UTC 2016
Gac represents government, not the judiciary. In most countries there is
a difference. I like mitigate in your list of verbs.
Stephanie Perrin
On 2016-08-23 11:39, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
>
> Sara’s redline is more constrained but does it omit our main job,
> which is to resolve/manage/accommodate/mitigate the divergent and
> sometimes contradictory interests in RDS which the earlier draft
> rather succinctly identified? (I realize all those verbs are
> different, and not sure which is the best.)
>
> If the “core problem” is really to “account for rules, regulations and
> laws” then should the job be turned over to the GAC which after all
> represents the sources and authoritative interpreters of those “rules,
> regulations and laws”? I doubt that would be a satisfactory way to
> proceed.
>
> *image001*
>
> *Steven J. Metalitz *|***Partner, through his professional corporation*
>
> T: 202.355.7902 |met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>**
>
> *Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp**LLP*|*www.msk.com <http://www.msk.com/>*
>
> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
>
> *_THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY
> FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED
> RECIPIENTS._**THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION,
> AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS
> MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY
> REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS
> STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR
> TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM
> YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.*
>
> *From:*gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Sullivan
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:44 AM
> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] For WG Review - Redlined Problem
> Statement
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:42:17PM +0000, Sara Bockey wrote:
> >
> > The problem statement should be explicit and to the point, without
> extraneous wording or viewpoints. Accordingly, my proposed revisions
> are attached.
> >
>
> I think this is vastly better because it is more constrained.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160823/f022c17f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2772 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160823/f022c17f/attachment.gif>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list