[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Is the U.S. handing over control of the internet? -- FCW

[Catalyst-Vaibhav Aggarwal]

Please don¹t write such Messages in this List - Its irrelevant !!!
I, can¹t say for others, don¹t need you to tell us if other groups are
existing or if IANA was important.

Thanks
-Over & Out from Me

On 8/31/16, 7:20 PM, "Michele Neylon - Blacknight"
<michele at blacknight.com> wrote:

>All
>
>The IANA transition is a very important and interesting topic for
>discussion. 
>
>However this PDP¹s mailing list is not the appropriate venue for those
>discussions. There are plenty of other mailing lists and groups where the
>discussion would be more pertinent.
>
>If you have a burning desire to discuss it with some of this group¹s
>members please do so offlist.
>
>
>Regards
>
>Michele
>
>
>--
>Mr Michele Neylon
>Blacknight Solutions
>Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>http://www.blacknight.host/
>http://blacknight.blog/
>http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage
>http://www.technology.ie
>Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>Social: http://mneylon.social
>Random Stuff: http://michele.irish
>-------------------------------
>Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>Park,Sleaty
>Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>
>On 30/08/2016, 19:52, "gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf
>of va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
>
>    It's just relevant - not important to be discussed. So if anyone
>thinking it is to be discussed- super not kool :-)
>    
>    My share was just fyi - not discussion ! Some people chose to make it
>a point to argue - well i chose to asert !
>    
>    Next time no Harry potter stories ;-)
>    
>    Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted.
>    
>    > On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan
><ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>    > 
>    > Dear colleagues,
>    > 
>    >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:33:50PM +0530, Group CEO-Vaibhav
>Aggarwal wrote:
>    >> Right so where is it irrelevant ? It is relevant - in this group,
>in other groups or even in the professional roles we are in !!!
>    > 
>    > While I'm flattered that anyone should even notice anything I
>    > published anywhere, I think there are other venues around ICANN that
>    > are concentrating on the IANA transition, and I suggest that perhaps
>    > their mailing lists are a better place to discuss that topic.  This
>    > PDP will almost certainly proceed the same way regardless of what
>    > happens with the IANA stewardship transition, and it is helpful to
>    > keep the list discussion focussed on the topic at hand.
>    > 
>    > Best regards,
>    > 
>    > A
>    > -- 
>    > Andrew Sullivan
>    > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>    > _______________________________________________
>    > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>    > gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>    > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>    
>    _______________________________________________
>    gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>    gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>    
>
>