[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - RDS PDP WG Meeting - 21 December 2016 at 6.00 UTC

[Gomes, Chuck]

Please be patient Shane.  It will be the exception rather than the rule if we reach consensus on one poll or one or two meetings. 

Other than the low number of responses, I was pleased with the results of the poll.  They gave the leadership team quite a lot of direction for our next meeting and we will use that to guide our next steps.  Note that one option for item 1 did not receive any support; that may be an option we can eliminate.  Lisa will share an analysis of the results that I found to be very insightful so we will be seeking feedback from members on her thoughts.  It is important to not look at just the raw numbers but also the responses as a whole and how they may interrelate.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Shane Kerr
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 6:24 AM
To: RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - RDS PDP WG Meeting - 21 December 2016 at 6.00 UTC

All,

At 2016-12-19 10:51:50 -0700
Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com> wrote:

> Attached you will also find results from last week's poll which will 
> be reviewed at the start of this week's call. Although the poll is now 
> closed, all WG members can provide further input during this week's 
> call.

Even with this narrow question I don't see a glimmer of consensus. It's going to be a fun call? :)

Cheers,

--
Shane