[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] RDS PDP WG Leadership
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Thu Jan 28 18:57:56 UTC 2016
I would agree, while respectfully suggesting that the lone dissenter
(yours truly) might have a different perspective to contribute.
Stephanie Perrin
On 2016-01-28 13:15, Volker Greimann wrote:
> One further consideration we may want to think about is ensuring that
> the WG is not only chaired by former members of the expert working
> group. A healthy mix of members ould be beneficial in the interest of
> neutrality and avoiding a mere continuation of the work of the EWG
> with more members.
>
> Our job is to review and analyze the result of the work of the EWG
> without presuming that the result they arrived at will also be the
> result of our deliberations. we should take their work as guidance. If
> the WG were to be chaired entirely by former members of the EWG , we
> might run the risk of following down the same path.
>
> A good mix would therefore be helpful.
>
> Best,
>
> Volker
>
>
> Am 28.01.2016 um 12:59 schrieb Amr Elsadr:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:15 PM, Stephanie Perrin
>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> [SNIP]
>>
>>> When I use the word independent, I mean that I have no client that
>>> is paying me to participate, nor an employer that has an interest in
>>> my participation. I think it might be useful in this regard if
>>> persons who use that word explain what they mean by it, because it
>>> is not clear to me that we have a common understanding of our usage
>>> of the term.
>> Thanks for this Stephanie. I completely agree. I had started to
>> become a bit concerned with how “independent” is being used, and may
>> be perceived in the context of this dialogue to mean non-GNSO. Being
>> a member of a GNSO stakeholder group or constituency and being
>> independent are not mutually exclusive. Likewise, not being
>> affiliated with the GNSO does not, in itself, mean a WG member is
>> independent.
>>
>> Marika’s explanation earlier on this thread seems the most helpful to
>> me. WG members are either affiliated with one or more ICANN SO/AC, or
>> are “individual” members of this PDP WG (as opposed to
>> “independent”). Of course, Members of SOs/ACs are free to join GNSO
>> working groups in their “individual” capacities as well.
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> Amr
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list