[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Five models of RDS (was Re: Apologies, and some reflections on requirements)

Mark Svancarek marksv at microsoft.com
Fri Jul 1 04:52:25 UTC 2016


That's why I'd be concerned 😃

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Rod Rasmussen<mailto:rrasmussen at infoblox.com>
Sent: ‎7/‎1/‎2016 6:27 AM
To: Mark Svancarek<mailto:marksv at microsoft.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan<mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Five models of RDS (was Re:  Apologies, and some reflections on requirements)

ICANN doend’t “run” most of the things coming under it’s remit or in the ecosystem it’s policies guide.  Any sort of RDS system regardless of model would likely fall into this category as well.  I thinks a few of the large registries run 5 9 operations for example…

> On Jun 30, 2016, at 11:15 PM, Mark Svancarek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>
>
> That's why I mentioned my concern about ICANN SLA.  I don't think they are ready to run a 99.999% online service.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160701/3d6dc117/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list