[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] The overflowing list (was Re: A new and rather important document with respect to jurisdiction issues)
Sam Lanfranco
sam at lanfranco.net
Tue Jul 19 12:37:31 UTC 2016
On July 15^th Andrew Sullivan posted with regard to additional documents:
“/I don't object, but I'm wondering whether there is really anything new
//in most of the additional documents people are bringing.”.
/
While it is agreed that there is nocut off date for additional documents
one simple practice that would make additions manageable is that
the contributor/poster offer a very short explanation of the relevance
of the document. Possible points would include:
* Is this a new point to consider, or does it add weight to an
existing point already being considered?
* Does it address a principle, a single or cluster of proposed data
points, or a use case?
* Does it address the issue of what is within or outside the ICANN
remit in this exercise?
* Does it reference an external factor that would impact on the public
interest dimensions of a data decision?
Sam L. NPOC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160719/1afca817/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg
mailing list