[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] possible alternative "groups"

[Stephanie Perrin]

As discussed in the call last week (July 20th), I had some alternative 
thoughts on the categories chosen to sort our triage spreadsheet, while 
very much appreciating the amount of work Lisa and Susan have already 
done on it.  Chuck asked me if I could come up with an alternative, as 
he did not want to slow down to tinker with the categories, which 
everyone might select differently. Accordingly, I have come up with what 
I hope is a framework of categories that relies more on the type of 
potential requirement (eg. function, technical, legal, etc) rather than 
keywords.  I have put almost all of the other groups into what I think 
are the logical slots in my proposed framework, and included a column 
for keywords if people really want to search by word phrases.

I hope this may be useful. We are likely to be working with this 
document for a long time, so I think the sorting framework which we 
ultimately use may be more important than it appears at first glance.  
It is really a coding mechanism for qualitative analysis, so it could 
introduce bias into our results if we are not careful.  My rough attempt 
obviously reflects my own analysis of how to sort the data, and as Chuck 
mentioned, each person would pick keywords differently, but I hope you 
agree after reading it that the matter deserves a bit more reflection.  
I would be happy to answer any questions.

Stephanie Perrin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160724/4a612a2f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Triage Draft v5.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 104492 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160724/4a612a2f/TriageDraftv5.docx>