[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Mon Jul 25 15:25:15 UTC 2016


Correct.  Note that this is the GNSO RDS PDP WG.

Chuck

From: Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:23 AM
To: Sivasubramanian M
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: RE: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )

From: isolatedn at gmail.com<mailto:isolatedn at gmail.com> [mailto:isolatedn at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian M
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:22 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] OT Re: An important technical consideration about nature of the service (was Re: The overflowing list )

Who are the policy makers in the multi-stakeholder framework?  Why not ICANN pay attention, at least to facilitate discussion on  this topic?

I think that’s what we’re doing here…

Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160725/4180743e/attachment.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list